Hi Sephe, Sorry for the slow res too. The response mail to sub...@... failed some reasons, also it took me a few days to realize :-)
I'll test your 3 patches for a while and your patches (including 'closed-out' flag operation) work well with qemu/kqemu environment. BTW, I guess we need a small patch for qemu to open correct tap device node (ex /dev/tap*0*), as I attached, but it is another story. I'm appreciate if someone can take care of the patch, if need. thanks a lot for your assistance. -Naoya On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau (via DragonFly issue tracker) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sepherosa Ziehau <[email protected]> added the comment: > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naoya Sugioka <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Sephe, >>> >>> Thank you for your comment. Here I made a patch which includes you pointed. >>> I hope you will review this patch too. >>> - Naoya >> >> Sorry for the delay, I will review it today. > > Could you test following three patches: > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/0001-tap-4-Add-ifclone-support.patch > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/0002-tap-4-Correct-reversed-logic.patch > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/0003-tap-4-More-fixes-to-tapuponopen.patch > > The first one is an adjusted version of your submitted patch. > > Best Regards, > sephe > > _____________________________________________________ > DragonFly issue tracker <[email protected]> > <http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue1357> > _____________________________________________________ >
net.c.diff
Description: Binary data
