On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Niklas Rosencrantz wrote: > 2009/10/9 Saifi Khan <saifi.k...@datasynergy.org> > > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Erik Wikstr?m wrote: > > > > > My proposal is that instead of releasing the code as X.Y.0 first make a > > > X.Y.0 RC (Release Candidate). While the RC might not see as much usage > > > > you make a valid point. > > > > Now for the same users, it may be a good idea to make the tag > > more search friendly as well. > > > > Perhaps something like > > x.y-rc > > > > and thus a .0 release has a clean tag 2.4.0 for example and > > search engine results are cleaner, since they are not littered > > with 2.4.0-RC and 2.4.0-RC2 etc. > > > > What do you think ? > > > > Trivial: the less numbers and more natural toward user the better. "dev" > "test" and "prod" are natural + POSIX time is very easy and natural to > understand and standard. 1 scriptsyncbuild conveniently mnemoniced (eg > "autorenew") to adjust whole thing, "autorenew" or likewise get latest > version from preferred order hg,git,svn,cvs. now don't now how to make > git-clone bit in the dark still super stable. > >
Thats nice, in that case the releases can be given a codename like: Claremont Merriwood Sibley Huckleberry Wildcat Tilden Layafette Chabot Devaney Garin Coyote Btw, the above are all reserve parks and there should be plenty of DragonFly's around :-) thanks Saifi.