On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > Binary package build for DragonFly 2.5.x on amd64 has completed, with a > greater-than-I-expected number of packages building. > > Total number of packages: 8969 > Successfully built: 7475 > Failed to build: 359 > Depending on failed package: 574 > Explicitly broken or masked: 497 > Depending on masked package: 64 >
Justin, thats awesome piece of work. Do you think it is a good idea to "weigh" build-fail/broken/masked packages against a usage list like https://www.osscensus.org/packages-rank-public.php?offset=0&limit=778&page=0 Using that approach one can showcase certain apps that work/build exceptionally well on the DragonFlyBSD platform. Perhaps somebody may have already reflected on this and that is something not obvious to a newbie like me. thanks Saifi.
