On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Dillon <[email protected]> wrote: > :Yes I checked it for both Master and Slave PFS the meta-data does get > mirrored. > :Some of them has 'migrated' at the end of it what does it mean? > : > :0x000000017627d370 2010-02-02 03:18:00 IST migrated > :0x0000000176b5ef40 2010-02-03 03:18:00 IST migrated > :0x00000001782a85e0 2010-02-04 03:18:21 IST > :0x00000001782d0370 2010-02-05 03:18:17 IST > > 'migrated' is just in the comment field for the snapshot. > The comment field can be set when making manual snapshots > too. > > :is it possible to access the snapshot If I know the TID? > :So as of now is it that I lost all the snapshots for my slave and I > :have to manually take snapshots of of the Slave PFS and store it some > :where outside the PFS untill something is implemented for > :regeneration? > :... > :Yes Matt thanks :-) > : > :--Siju > > Yes, just use a similar path to the way the softlinks are > constructed, using the TID, e.g.: > > cd <fs>/@@0x000000017627d370 >
Alright Matt. That is fine :-) > The snapshots are still there (pruning is governed by > the snapshot list in the meta-data). If you want a > convenient set of softlinks you can construct them > by writing a little script based on the snapls output. > OK got it :-) Thanks --Siju
