What i remember happened to me was that master pfs are pruned/reblocked by the periodic but the slave pfs are not, so time to time i used to get a lot of used space in my backups, just go and prune/reblock by hand and check if thats what happening to you, check the config before, so you sure not deleting stuff you dont want to. Damian
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 04:03, Siju George <sgeorge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have two hammer file systems. > > Backup1 454G 281G 173G 62% /Backup1 > Backup2 454G 316G 138G 70% /Backup2 > > on a 2.7-DEVELOPMENT DragonFly v2.7.0.54.g0754fe-DEVELOPMENT #18: Wed Apr > 7 > > Backup1 contains 3 pfses > > dfly-bkpsrv# cd /Backup1 > dfly-bkpsrv# ls -l > total 0 > drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Mar 26 13:38 Data > drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Apr 5 15:36 VersionControl > drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Oct 8 2009 pfs > drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Feb 3 09:46 test > > Backup2 contains just the mirrored slves of the above 3 pfses > > dfly-bkpsrv# cd /Backup2 > dfly-bkpsrv# ls -l > total 0 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Jul 7 2009 Data -> /Backup2/pfs/Data > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 27 Sep 28 2009 VersionControl -> > /Backup2/pfs/VersionControl > drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Oct 8 2009 pfs > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Oct 8 2009 test -> /Backup2/pfs/test > > the snapshots are the same as of now for both masters and slaves > > dfly-bkpsrv# hammer snapls /Backup1/Data/ > Snapshots on /Backup1/Data PFS #1 > Transaction ID Timestamp Note > 0x00000001b998acd0 2010-04-07 13:04:02 IST - > 0x00000001bd9525b0 2010-04-08 20:30:06 IST - > 0x00000001bf96f710 2010-04-09 20:30:07 IST - > dfly-bkpsrv# hammer snapls /Backup2/Data/ > Snapshots on (null) PFS #1 > Transaction ID Timestamp Note > 0x00000001b998acd0 2010-04-07 13:04:02 IST - > 0x00000001bd9525b0 2010-04-08 20:30:06 IST - > 0x00000001bf96f710 2010-04-09 20:30:07 IST - > dfly-bkpsrv# > > dfly-bkpsrv# hammer snapls /Backup1/VersionControl/ > Snapshots on /Backup1/VersionControl PFS #2 > Transaction ID Timestamp Note > 0x00000001b99af1c0 2010-04-07 13:24:57 IST - > 0x00000001bd952790 2010-04-08 20:56:40 IST - > 0x00000001bf96f8d0 2010-04-09 20:56:48 IST - > dfly-bkpsrv# hammer snapls /Backup2/VersionControl/ > Snapshots on (null) PFS #2 > Transaction ID Timestamp Note > 0x00000001b99af1c0 2010-04-07 13:24:57 IST - > 0x00000001bd952790 2010-04-08 20:56:40 IST - > 0x00000001bf96f8d0 2010-04-09 20:56:48 IST - > > Snapshots on /Backup1/test PFS #3 > Transaction ID Timestamp Note > 0x00000001c1982760 2010-04-12 14:27:30 IST - > dfly-bkpsrv# hammer snapls /Backup2/test/ > Snapshots on (null) PFS #3 > Transaction ID Timestamp Note > 0x00000001bf980a60 2010-04-12 14:27:38 IST - > > > So why Backup2 70% filled while Backup1 is only 62% filled ? > > Thanks :-) > > --Siju > -- http://dfbsd.trackbsd.org.ar
