On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:04:21 +0200 Stathis Kamperis <ekamp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/11/3 Przemysław Pawełczyk <pp...@o2.pl>: > > Hi, > > > > 1. Why PF 4.2 not 4.7 or 4.8? > > > > OpenBSD page http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html > > has one important remark bolded: "In particular, there are > > significant differences between 4.6 and 4.7." > > > > Doeas it mean that I would have to learn something rather > > old - how to use PF 4.2 instead of PF 4.7/4.8. Right? > > > > It's easier (but still very hard) to do incremental updates of PF, > than to jump to the most recent version of it. Besides, just think of > it. OpenBSD developers themselves, went through all the intermediate > versions before landing in 4.8. Hi, "Besides, just think of it." As the OpenBSD team ***did*** the work (for others, DF including) why not to jump to the latest version? Is not justified such thinking? > I also grab the chance to thank Jan Lentfer in public, for his > dedication and hard efforts that yielded excellent results. My God, I only asked why... You are the second person paying tribute to Mr Jan Lentfer publicly for His works taking advantage of my e-mail. Did I say anything belittling His efforts and the results? I thought it was understandable to all that His works are highly appreciated. Regards P.S. Why everybody answers to my account and to the mailing list? I subscribed to the mailing list with provision not to be clobbered with double e-mails. -- Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick] http://pp.blast.pl, pp...@o2.pl
pgpyad5fk9XM2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
