Matthew Dillon wrote:
As part of the 48-core support some significant scheduler changes
have gone into master, so again HEADS UP there may be some instability.
How do these scheduler changes relate to say, userland preemption or things of that nature (thinking soft-realtime, scheduling priority, etc) ?
I know in the past in general you've said thats not really a design goal - but, anyhow, seems to relate based on the commit messages
cheers - Chris
