> both are excluding DragonFly, since uname -s return "DragonFly" and > OSARCH is usually set to the same value. I can solve this by redefining > OSARCH variable and UNAME_s shell variable as "DragonFlyBSD", which > makes less work to do. But it doesn't seem very clean to me, so I'm not > using it. But it does mean that choosing FreeBSD as build type won't > necessarly mean no changes required on the autotool scripts. > > - Some programs are compiling successfully by defining FreeBSD as build > type. Is DragonFly kept close as possible to FreeBSD on purpose or > should we expect this to be a vanishing legacy? > > Official positions here will me help me knowing what to expect while > porting. > > Thanks, > > SR >
Vanishing legacy, never depend on it. Sam
