On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Wojciech Puchar <woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > i have few questions. i am currently using FreeBSD, dragonfly was just > tried. > > 1) why on amd64 platform swapcache is said to be limited to 512GB? actually > it may be real limit on larger setup with more than one SSD. > > 2) it is said that you are limited to cache about 400000 inodes unless you > use sysctl setting vfs.hammer.doublebuffer or so. > > in the same time it is said to be able to cache any filesystem. > > Can UFS be cached efficiently with millions of files? > > 3) how about reboots? From my understanding reboot, even clean, means losing > ALL cached data. am i right?
As far as I have used swapcache, all cached data are lost after rebooting. > > > In spite of HAMMER being far far far better implementation of filesystem > that ZFS, i don't want to use any of them for the same reasons. > > UFS is safe. Hmm, hammer is safe too :) > > 4) will virtualbox or qemu-kvm or similar tool be ported ever to DragonFly? Don't know the state about virtualbox. However, qemu works. Best Regards, sephe > i am not fan of virtualizing everything, which is pure marketing nonsense, > but i do some virtualize few windows sessions on server. > > thanks -- Tomorrow Will Never Die