The following should work - you point at the enum you wish to customise.
However this doesn't work with a global binding - am about to file a bug
against this once I get a few test cases together.

<jaxws:bindings wsdlLocation="./test.wsdl"
    xmlns:jaxws="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxws";
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
    xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb";
    xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"; version="2.0">

    <jaxws:bindings
        node="wsdl:definitions/wsdl:types/xsd:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
http://www.example.org/test/']">
           <jaxb:bindings node="./xsd:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'TestEnum']">
                    <jaxb:typesafeEnumClass name="TestEnum">
                        <jaxb:typesafeEnumMember name="SUCCESS" value="0" />
                        <jaxb:typesafeEnumMember name="FAILURE" value="1"
/>
                    </jaxb:typesafeEnumClass>
                </jaxb:bindings>
            </jaxws:bindings>
    </jaxws:bindings>

</jaxws:bindings>



On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> This is definitely a question more for the JAXB list at jaxb.java.net or
> something.
>
> That said, I would look at section 7.5.1 of the jaxb spec a bit more.  If
> there is something, it would be there.   Looking at it, you MIGHT be
> able to do something like:
>
> <globalBindings typesafeEnumBase="xs:string,xs:int"/>
> to allow it to create enums for "int" types.  I'm by no means a jaxb
> expert so I'm not sure if that really is what is needed.  You might also
> need to add typesafeEnumMemberName="generateName"
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > i know, but i don't want to customize all wsdls .. i'm looking for
> > common global binding or extension
> > thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Adrian Corcoran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 04/29/2008 20:21
> > Bitte antworten an
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > An
> > [email protected]
> > Kopie
> >
> > Thema
> > Re: global jaxb binding to force to generate java enum [Virus checked]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > you need to use
> > <jaxb:typesafeEnumMember name="XX" value="1" />
> > for the enum member
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:25 PM,
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > i have problem with several WSDLs, which are using complex types
> > > like
> >
> > this
> >
> > > ..  one of element contains anonymous inner definition of
> > > restriction of simpleType.
> > >
> > >  <complexType name='MyType'>
> > >  <sequence>
> > >   <element name='ID' type='string'/>
> > >   <element name='type'>
> > >    <simpleType>
> > >     <restriction base='int'>
> > >      <enumeration value='1'/>
> > >      <enumeration value='3'/>
> > >      <enumeration value='4'/>
> > >      <enumeration value='7'/>
> > >      <enumeration value='11'/>
> > >     </restriction>
> > >    </simpleType>
> > >   </element>
> > >  </sequence>
> > >  </complexType>
> > >
> > >
> > > is there a possibility to define in binding (global binding or using
> >
> > SCD)
> >
> > > to always force jaxB to generate java enum for it with some name
> > > (e.g. ComplexType name concatenated with element name)?
> > >
> > > when i changed single definition to
> > > <complexType
> > > ....
> > >   <element name='type'>
> > >    <simpleType>
> > > <xsd:annotation>
> > >     <xsd:appinfo>
> > >        <jxb:typesafeEnumClass name="xx"/>
> > >     </xsd:appinfo>
> > >  </xsd:annotation>
> > >  <restriction base='int'>
> > > ....
> > > i have an error
> > > [INFO] Thrown by JAXB : Cannot generate a constant name from the
> > > enumeration value "1". Use <jaxb:typesafeEnumMember name="..."/> to
> > > specify one.
> > >
> > > also this should be done somehow automatically .. e.g. in case of
> > > number type, enum constants could be e.g. _X (underscore + value)
> > > and it should take real value as constructor arg. of type int or
> > > whatever (depending
> >
> > on
> >
> > > type from xml schema)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > best regards
> > > jano
>
>
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>

Reply via email to