Daniel,

Great work as always! Thanks for the update. Let me know when you have the
patches applied and I will give it a test.

Will give the work arounds a try in the mean time,

Keep up the good work!

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Adrian,
>
> Just dug into these and found a bunch of issues with the applications of
> the bindings file.   Thanks for the test cases.
>
> In the "case 2" that you have, it MIGHT work if you add a top level
> xsd:annotation/xsd:appinfo element to the schema.  It can be blank, but it
> should be.   The code seems to be using the wrong method to find it and it's
> actually finding the first in the whole tree, not the immediate child of
> schema.  Thus, the global binding stuff is added to the one in TestEnum and
> then screwing everything up.
>
> "case 3" has other issues.   Digging into the code, there are definite
> issues if a jaxws:bindings element has multiple jaxb binding things in it.
>  It looks like only the first jaxb:bindings element is honored and
> jaxb:globalBindings isn't honored at all if there is a jaxb:bindings.
>
> Thus, you MAY be able to work around it with multiple jaxws:bindings
> elements, each with a single jaxb extensor in it.
>
> In anycase, I should have fixes for it shortly.  With the Apache SVN
> issues, I'm not sure if I'll get it committed today or not.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> Adrian C wrote:
>
> > Hi Glen
> > Thanks for the reply - there are so many connotations of this its crazy!
> > :)
> > But have created a JIRA issue.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1565
> >
> > There seems to be a work around, however its not one that will work for
> > me.
> > There is an interoperability issue between CXF and .NET 2.0 ... problem
> > seems to be on the .net side. .NET 2.0 is not able to handle dates in
> > the
> > format yyyy '-' mm '-' dd 'T00:00:00' zzzzzz? (the lexical
> > representation)
> > it is only able to handle the canonical representation. Therefore to
> > help
> > any .NET consumers of our service, we plan to able to specify our own
> > class
> > generate xsd:date as cononical format always and to parse either.
> > However we
> > don;t want out java users to have to have our date parsing class on
> > their
> > classpath to generate their consumer! So having the xsd:date
> > customisation
> > inline is not a runner for us!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
> >
> >
> > Glen Mazza-2 wrote:
> >
> > > Please take a look at our bindings samples:
> > >
> > > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/wsdl-to-java.html#WSDLtoJava-JAXWSCustomization
> > >
> > > Is anything related to your problem--if you try to configure the
> > > binding
> > > in a different manner (within WSDL, or separate on command line), do
> > > the
> > > same problems occur?
> > >
> > > If so, I would recommend sending a JIRA report on this problem
> > > (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF)--give<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF%29--give>us
> > >  the simplest WSDL
> > > and binding file that works like a charm on Metro but raises problems
> > > with CXF.
> > >
> > > Note that CXF uses the same JAXB library as Metro, so anything
> > > JAXB-related should be the same between the two WS stacks.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Glen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2008-04-24 Adrian C wrote:
> > >
> > > > Has no one come across an issue similar to this - am lead to believe
> > > > its
> > > > a
> > > > bug in the wsdl2java tooling as I can get this to work with
> > > > wsimport!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Adrian C wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am having some problems with jaxw binding customizations.
> > > > > The first problem that I am having is mixing a globalBindings
> > > > >
> > > > definition
> > > >
> > > > > with a bindings - the global bindings seems to be ignored. For the
> > > > >
> > > > example
> > > >
> > > > > below if I use it as is, I only get my typesafeEnumClass
> > > > > generated. My
> > > > > instances of XMLGregorianCalendar are not replaced with
> > > > > java.util.Date.
> > > > > However, if I remove the jaxb:bindings node then the global
> > > > > binding
> > > > >
> > > > works
> > > >
> > > > > fine. Can anyone shed any light on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > The other issue I have is if I have in-lined customizations and
> > > > >
> > > > external
> > > >
> > > > > customizations I cam getting an error reporting inconsistencies -
> > > > >
> > > > anyone
> > > >
> > > > > ever had this issue and resolved it?
> > > > >
> > > > > This has all been doing my nut in - so any help would be
> > > > > appreciated!
> > > > >
> > > > > <jaxws:bindings
> > > > > wsdlLocation="../Output/IdentityManagement_v1.wsdl"
> > > > >        xmlns:jaxws="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxws";
> > > > >        xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> > > > >        xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb";
> > > > >        xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
> > > > > version="2.0">
> > > > >        <jaxws:bindings
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  node="wsdl:definitions/wsdl:types/xsd:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > http://www.test.com/ws/de' <http://www.test.com/ws/de%27>]">
> > > >
> > > > >                <jaxb:globalBindings>
> > > > >                        <jaxb:javaType name="java.util.Date"
> > > > > xmlType="xsd:date"
> > > > >
> > > > >  parseMethod="org.apache.cxf.tools.common.DataTypeAdapter.parseDate"
> > > > >
> > > > >  printMethod="org.apache.cxf.tools.common.DataTypeAdapter.printDate"
> > > > >
> > > > />
> > > >
> > > > >                </jaxb:globalBindings>
> > > > >
> > > > >                <jaxb:bindings
> > > > > node="./xsd:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'MyEnum']">
> > > > >                        <jaxb:typesafeEnumClass>
> > > > >                                <jaxb:typesafeEnumMember
> > > > > name="ZERO" value="0" />
> > > > >                        </jaxb:typesafeEnumClass>
> > > > >                </jaxb:bindings>
> > > > >
> > > > >        </jaxws:bindings>
> > > > >
> > > > > </jaxws:bindings>
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>

Reply via email to