I've ended up thoroughly going thought my classpath and resolved some
possible conflicts with CXF. everything is now working as expected.

Thanks for the support,
Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 06 June 2008 18:44
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: webservice binding issue


Hmmmm....

We updated to XmlSchema to 1.4.2 in the latest releases (2.0.6/2.1) as  
it fixes a WHOLE bunch of blocker bugs that users were hitting.   
Example, if any of your jaxb beans were final, it would barf.

However, in your stack trace, I see:

> org 
> .apache 
> .cxf 
> .service.factory.ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.buildServiceFromClass


Thus, you aren't using a WSDL at runtime.   Is there any chance you  
could try specifying a wsdl location and seeing if that works?   That  
may help narrow it down a bit.


Dan




On Jun 6, 2008, at 5:39 AM, Daniel Wood wrote:

> Hi Dan,  unfortunately I can't send a test case due to the IP on the
> wsdl. However, here is the full stack trace:
>
>
>
> testRetrieveParties 
> (xxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx.service.party.PartyManagerServiceIm
> plTest)  Time elapsed: 1.719 sec  <<< ERROR!
>
> org.apache.ws.commons.schema.XmlSchemaException: Schema name  
> conflict in
> collection. Namespace: http://xmlschemas.XXXXXX.com/PartyManager_WS
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.ws.commons.schema.SchemaBuilder.handleXmlSchemaElement(Schema
> Builder.java:104)
>
>            at
> org.apache.ws.commons.schema.SchemaBuilder.build(SchemaBuilder.java: 
> 83)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.ws.commons.schema.XmlSchemaCollection.read(XmlSchemaCollectio
> n.java:424)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.ws.commons.schema.XmlSchemaCollection.read(XmlSchemaCollectio
> n.java:418)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.common.xmlschema.SchemaCollection.read(SchemaCollection.j
> ava:118)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.databinding.source.AbstractDataBinding.addSchemaDocument(
> AbstractDataBinding.java:77)
>
>            at
> org.apache.cxf.jaxb.JAXBDataBinding.initialize(JAXBDataBinding.java: 
> 326)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.service.factory.ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.buildService
> FromClass(ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.java:319)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.service.factory.ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.initializeSe
> rviceModel(ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.java:370)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.service.factory.ReflectionServiceFactoryBean.create(Refle
> ctionServiceFactoryBean.java:162)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.jaxws.support.JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.create(JaxWsService
> FactoryBean.java:97)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.frontend.AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory.createEndpoint(
> AbstractWSDLBasedEndpointFactory.java:74)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.frontend.ClientFactoryBean.create(ClientFactoryBean.java:
> 51)
>
>            at
> org 
> .apache.cxf.frontend.ClientProxyFactoryBean.create(ClientProxyFactory
> Bean.java:92)
>
>            at
> xxx 
> .xxx.xxxx.xxx.service.ServiceImpl.getEndPointInteface(ServiceImpl.jav
> a:110)
>
>            at xxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx
> service 
> .party.PartyManagerServiceImpl.getInterface(PartyManagerServiceIm
> pl.java:23)
>
>            at
> xxx 
> .xxx.xxxx.xxx.service.party.PartyManagerServiceImpl.retrieveParties(P
> artyManagerServiceImpl.java:39)
>
>            at
> xxx 
> .xxx.xxxx.xxx.service.party.PartyManagerServiceImplTest.testRetrieveP
> arties(PartyManagerServiceImplTest.java:42)
>
>
>
> When did cxf get upgrade to XmlSchema 1.4.x?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person  
> or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged  
> and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient,  
> you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on  
> it. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify  
> the sender immediately. All messages passing through this gateway  
> are virus scanned. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail  
> are those of the individual sender except where they are stated to  
> be the views of RDF Group plc or its subsidiaries, RDF Consulting  
> (registered number 3522265), RDF Resources (3984500) and Aqua  
> Resources Group (4975898). RDF Group plc is registered in England at  
> 2 Bartholomews, Brighton, BN1 1HG (registered number 3637683).

---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog






This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or 
organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and 
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not 
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received 
this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately. All messages 
passing through this gateway are virus scanned. Any opinions or advice 
contained in this e-mail are those of the individual sender except where they 
are stated to be the views of RDF Group plc or its subsidiaries, RDF Consulting 
(registered number 3522265), RDF Resources (3984500) and Aqua Resources Group 
(4975898). RDF Group plc is registered in England at 2 Bartholomews, Brighton, 
BN1 1HG (registered number 3637683).

Reply via email to