Hi,
sorry to be less informative on the first run, here is what i have:
- CXF 2.1
- JAXB (default mapping)
- all classes are public (not static)
- no default constructor on the nested classes (do i really have to
manually create it?)
- no JAXB annotations
As i am writing this, i have the feeling that i am missing everything
i shouldnt miss. I thought that even without the JAXB annotations,
there would be sensible defaults how to map my classes.
So whats the best route to take from here?
--
Marc Logemann
blog http://logemannreloaded.blogspot.com
privat http://www.logemann.org
Am 24.06.2008 um 02:48 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
We would definitely need to see more details...
Primarily, are the nested classes "public static" and have the
appropriate default constructor? Everything properly annotated
with JAXB annotations? Etc...
Dan
On Jun 23, 2008, at 8:22 PM, Marc Logemann wrote:
Hi,
i just created a more complicated webservice, means, receiving a
complex "order" class. This order class has many nested classes in
it as you can imagine.
I always thought that the class stucture is exposed via the wsdl
but it isnt. But when i create a more simple class (no nested
classes, only primitive attributes) and use this as method
signature of my webservice, the generated wsdl exposes the
structure of the expected parameter.
All i get is:
<xs:complexType name="order">
<xs:sequence/>
</xs:complexType>
What does this mean? Does it mean that i will have to distribute
the domain objects which are part of the contract so that the
caller can create a client? I always thought the wsdl tells
everything about my services and expected structures.... Currently
no one should be able to create an apropriate client for my
webservice, especially not my primary testing tool SoapUI.
Note: i just used the java-ws annotations for webservices classes
and methods. I also named the parameters via @WebParam.
--
Marc Logemann
blog http://logemannreloaded.blogspot.com
privat http://www.logemann.org
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog