OK, I understand the status here And yes indeed, a REST client factory would very valuable to this project :)
Anyway I'll keep an eye on the development status On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 22:37, Sergey Beryozkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I see what you mean know. > To be honest, I haven't even thought about the client side yet. > I'm wondering if the Jersey Client API will eventually get standardized ? > In meantime, providing a simpler JAXRSClientFactoryBean for CXF would > definitely be worth it, thanks for raising this issue. The only thing is > that I'm not sure when I can get to doing some work in this area - for now > it's just about JAX-RS server side and all the related things... > > Thanks, Sergey > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 June 2008 18:06 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: About annotation inheritance, and HTTP properties > > > > > Ok, so to have a REST client we can use the following code in Java. > > ============================== > >> > >> ======================= > >> JaxWsProxyFactoryBean sf = new JaxWsProxyFactoryBean(); > >> sf.setServiceClass(RestService.class); > >> sf.getServiceFactory().setWrapped(false); > >> > >> > sf.getClientFactoryBean().setBindingId(HttpBindingFactory.HTTP_BINDING_ID); > >> // Allow the client to understand Rest > >> sf.setAddress("http://localhost:8080/xml/";); > >> CustomerService cs = (CustomerService)sf.create(); > >> ===================================================== > >> > > > > > > Looks like this time you're looking at the CXF-private HttpBinding - this > > is completely orthogonal to what CXF JAX-RS offers and it's not well > > mantained. > > > > Yes, I know this way of building a REST client is a bit tricky, but there > is > no other that I know about. > As I didn't yet looked at the client with jaxrs annotations, mine is still > based on the jra project from codehaus, maybe this client wont be able to > understand or process the jaxrs annotations. > > Is there a JaxRsClientFactoryBean project on the way, this is really a > missing component in CXF as REST is becoming more popular (and for good > reasons). > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 18:29, Sergey Beryozkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > Hi Brice > > > >> Ok, I understand better the case, I just read in surface the > >> specification, > >> I am not well aware then of those recommendations. > >> I only saw that the jaxrs annotations are not annotated with @Inherited, > >> but > >> it's okay if CXF implementation do the job to check the interfaces. I > hope > >> this will be integrated as soon as possible to avoid bad programmation > >> behavior. > >> > > > > ok > > > > > >> Sorry I mixed up things yesterday night. I was thinking about Timeouts > >> Well our application should be coherent in the way that the integrators > >> should only have properties file to modify. > >> > >> Here's a Spring configuration that works well, the timeouts are > correctly > >> set on the conduit > >> ===================================================== > >> <bean id="conf" > >> > >> > > class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigure > r"/> > >> > >> <http-conf:conduit name="*RestService.http-conduit" > > >> <http-conf:client > >> ReceiveTimeout="5000" > >> ConnectionTimeout="5000" > >> /> > >> > >> <http:authorization> > >> <sec:UserName>usernamehere</sec:UserName> > >> <sec:Password>passwordhere</sec:Password> > >> </http:authorization> > >> </http-conf:conduit> > >> ===================================================== > >> > >> But if I want to use properties like that > >> ===================================================== > >> <http-conf:client > >> ReceiveTimeout="${http.receive.timeout}" > >> ConnectionTimeout="${http.connection.timeout}" > >> /> > >> ===================================================== > >> Then the xml declaration is no more valid because the properties > datatype > >> should be unsignedInteger. > >> > >> > > This sounds reasonable, it's not a CXF JAX-RS though. Perhaps Dan or > > someone else can look at your proposal > > in more details... > > > > > >>> > >>> > >>>> And last question, do you plan to create JAXRSClient factory bean, > right > >>>> know using the JaxWsPRoxyFactoryBean is a bit intricate when declaring > >>>> it > >>>> in > >>>> a Spring application context and setting properties like setWrapped. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Please expand on it a bit more too. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Ok, so to have a REST client we can use the following code in Java. > >> ===================================================== > >> JaxWsProxyFactoryBean sf = new JaxWsProxyFactoryBean(); > >> sf.setServiceClass(RestService.class); > >> sf.getServiceFactory().setWrapped(false); > >> > >> > sf.getClientFactoryBean().setBindingId(HttpBindingFactory.HTTP_BINDING_ID); > >> // Allow the client to understand Rest > >> sf.setAddress("http://localhost:8080/xml/";); > >> CustomerService cs = (CustomerService)sf.create(); > >> ===================================================== > >> > > > > > > Looks like this time you're looking at the CXF-private HttpBinding - this > > is completely orthogonal to what CXF JAX-RS offers and it's not well > > mantained. > > > > Cheers, Sergey > > > > > > > > > >> However if I want to create a Spring bean of this service (without > >> creating > >> a custom BeanFactory), we need to look into the factory to set some > >> properties like the "wrapped" one > >> ===================================================== > >> <bean id="serviceFactory" > >> class="org.apache.cxf.jaxws.support.JaxWsServiceFactoryBean"> > >> <property name="wrapped" value="false" /> > >> </bean> > >> <bean id="clientFactoryBean" > >> class="org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsClientFactoryBean"> > >> <property name="serviceFactory" ref="serviceFactory" /> > >> <property name="serviceClass" value="com.rest.tryout.RestService" /> > >> </bean> > >> <bean id="restServiceProxyFactory" > >> class="org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsProxyFactoryBean"> > >> <property name="clientFactoryBean" ref="clientFactoryBean" /> > >> <property name="address" value="${server.http.address}" /> > >> <property name="bindingId"> > >> <util:constant > >> > >> > > static-field="org.apache.cxf.binding.http.HttpBindingFactory.HTTP_BINDING_ID > " > >> /> > >> </property> > >> </bean> > >> > >> <bean id="restServiceClient" > >> class="com.rest.tryout.RestService" > >> factory-bean="restServiceProxyFactory" > >> factory-method="create" /> > >> ===================================================== > >> > >> I was mentionning the intricacy of this declaration, and I did this work > >> while still on 2.0.5, however I believe the Spring jaxrs bean > declarations > >> still doesn't propose to set such properties. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Cheers, Sergey > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Thx in advance for your answers. > >>>> > >>>> Btw CXF is really a Great work :) > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Brice Dutheil > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ---------------------------- > >>> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) > >>> Registered Number: 171387 > >>> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, > Ireland > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Brice Dutheil > >> > >> > > ---------------------------- > > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) > > Registered Number: 171387 > > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland > > > > > > -- > Bryce > > ---------------------------- > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) > Registered Number: 171387 > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland > -- Brice Dutheil
