WL 10.0 at least does have a JAX-WS implementation, but none of the security features are implemented for it--for that you still need their JAX-RPC.
I guess it depends on the security features that you need. If you plan on using SAML tokens or WS-SecurityPolicy, I would recommend staying with the WL web service stack. If not, then Metro or CXF are options for you. On my blog, on the right-side "Last 15" menu, the Web Service links of 27 Apr and 11 May may be of use for you, also here[1] for deploying Metro or CXF on WebLogic, if you choose to go that route. [1] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/deploying_metro_and_cxf_based HTH, Glen 2008-07-03 John-M Baker wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the pros & cons of using CXF over WL9.1? > > To start, looking at the package names (MessageContext), WL uses JAX-RPC > rather than JAX-WS, yet both use JWS. > > Any feedback welcome. > > > John Baker > -- > Web SSO > IT Infrastructure > Deutsche Bank London > > URL: http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com > > > --- > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you > are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please > notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized > copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is > strictly forbidden. > > Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for > additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
