bharath_t19 wrote: > > Thanks Glen.MTOM is a part of the WS-I Basic Profile 1.2.Is CXF compliant > with this? >
Short answer: no. Long, mushy, politician's answer: CXF is compliant with the JAX-WS spec, it can't serve two masters. Where the JAX-WS spec has shaped by the WS-I Basic Profile (e.g., no rpc/encoded WSDL's allowed by the latter, so the former doesn't permit it), the answer is "yes". But to the extent that WS-I is really an issue about how humans code their web services, the answer is "no"--CXF doesn't stop people from violating WS-I. Sometimes, though, it *does* stop people from violating a WS-I rule even though it's permitted by JAX-WS, for example here: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071019#notes (See note #1)--this is a case where CXF's internal implementation relies on people not violating a WS-I rule. Glen -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-WSI-Basci-Profile-1.1---CXF-tp18934397p18955970.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
