He posted a JIRA, but I didn't look at it for a testcase. On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's probably my fault. I spent a ton of time in that code for 2.1.1 > trying > to get it to resolve schemas more or less correctly and a bit more quickly. > There were bunched of problems with schemas not getting resolved in 2.1.0. > The main thing was to try and use all the schemas that the schemacollection > had already resolved up front to avoid having to re-resolve them at all. > > Apparently, something still isn't quite right there. Is there any way you > can bang together a testcase and send off to me? > > Thanks! > > Dan > > > > On Monday 29 September 2008 3:31:23 pm Brendan Collins wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In moving from cxf 2.1.0 to 2.1.1 (or 2.1.2) I am encountering the > > following problem: > > > > org.apache.cxf.wsdl.EndpointReferenceUtils.resolveResource() fails to > > resolve schema imports because systemId is null when trying to resolve > > the URI. > > > > > > Interestingly the comment at the top of EndpointReferenceUtils reads > > as follows: > > > > /** > > * We want to load the schemas, including references to external > > schemas, into a SchemaFactory > > * to validate. There seem to be bugs in resolving inter-schema > > references in Xerces, so even when we are > > * handing the factory all the schemas, interrelated with > > <import> elements, we need > > * to also hand over extra copies (!) as character images when > > requested. > > * > > * To do this, we use the DOM representation kept in the > > SchemaInfo. This has the bonus > > * of benefiting from the use of the catalog resolver in there, > > which is missing from > > * the code in here. > > */ > > > > It looks like the code that this comment refers to was removed in > > 2.1.1, and that code does in fact resolve my schema's correctly. > > > > Does anyone have any insight as to how I might fix this....I have > > looked at my schema's trying to find issues with imports and have not > > found any issues. Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Brendan > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
