On Tuesday 30 September 2008, Idar Borlaug wrote: > 2008/9/29 Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Monday 29 September 2008 3:04:59 am idar wrote: > >> Hum... I am using a WSDL first approach, and the port url in the > >> WSDL file is not rewritten by CXF as the urls to xsd schema are. Is > >> a WSDLQueryHandler the best approach to rewrite the wsdl:port > >> adress? > > > > CXF SHOULD be re-writing the addresses. If not, that's a problem. > > It did fix this, i rewrote all my targetnamespace and fixed on some > service names, so they corresponded to the names if i generated a > wsdl. > > > The NORMAL cause for this is a mismatch between the servicename and > > endpoint/port names in the spring config/annotations. The latest > > 2.1.3 snapshots now warn about that on the console. If you could > > try the 2.1.3 snapshots and see if that helps, that would be great. > > I am using mule 2.0.2 and it uses CXF 2.0.6 so 2.1.3 is major work for > me. But i found a solution. > > I am also interested in being able to affect the rewriting of the > urls, if i deploy my webservice to a cluster i want to be able to > specify the host. Is this easily possible?
Yep. The jaxws:endpoint things in the spring config have a special property that can be set to control the published location. publishedEndpointUrl="http://......."; That MAY require 2.0.7 or newer though. I'm not sure if that made it into 2.0.6. Dan > > > Dan > > > >> dkulp wrote: > >> > Yea. Very early on, a decision was made to add special > >> > "QueryHandlers" that > >> > allow the HTTP targets to filter through things that aren't > >> > "service related" > >> > things. The WSDL returning is implemented as a query handler > >> > (WSDLQueryHandler). Thus, the interceptors don't come into play > >> > for it. > >> > > >> > You can register your own QueryHandler which would run before > >> > ours, but you > >> > would need to do all of the wsdl stuff. (You could use our code > >> > as a base) > >> > > >> > Dan > >> > > >> > On Friday 26 September 2008 9:33:20 am Andrew Clegg wrote: > >> >> 2008/9/26 Idar Borlaug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> > Hi > >> >> > > >> >> > I am trying to create an interceptor that will trigger when > >> >> > someone asks for the WSDL. I want to rewrite it based on some > >> >> > settings. I thought an interceptor would be a good way of > >> >> > doing this. But my interceptors only trigger on method calls. > >> >> > Even LoggingOutInterceptor dosen't trigger on WSDL. > >> >> > >> >> Umm, perhaps someone more knowledgeable will correct me if I'm > >> >> wrong, but I don't think interceptors are used in requests for > >> >> the WSDL at all. Because you're not invoking a web service when > >> >> you request the WSDL. > >> >> > >> >> What exactly are you trying to do -- modify the content of the > >> >> WSDL on the way out? > >> >> > >> >> Andrew. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Daniel Kulp > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer, IONA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
