I attached a patch, https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ManageAttachments.jspa?id=12407335
Thank you both for replying, I'll submit a patch tonight. Santosh -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 9:36 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Benson Margulies Subject: Re: Suggestion: Hook into LoggingOutInterceptor On Friday 24 October 2008 6:38:30 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > Actually, I'd prefer if you change the interceptor to have a protected > function that does nothing. Thus, the pattern will be to make a > subclass that overrides the function instead of passing in a filtering > function. This seems somehow more consistent with everything else. I agree. A simple protected method to handle this is preferred. <clipped> -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Suggestion%3A-Hook-into-LoggingOutInterceptor-tp20157829p20201405.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
