I'm reasonably certain that this works, but I'm not the guy who can tell you the recipe.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Andrew123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, it is associating a class with an interface, thanks. What about adding > header in interceptor? I found, how add header to soap mesage, but I need > BindingProvider. Can I get it from interceptor? > > > Benson Margulies-4 wrote: >> >> I don't have enough context here to answer #2. If this is the feature >> of associating a class with an interface, then the answer is yes, but >> the configuration process is different. Please read the Aegis doc. >> >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Andrew123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I want to move my application from xfire to CXF. But I have few >>> questions. >>> >>> 1. Before calling web service I set some parameters to request header. I >>> use >>> handlers in xfire for this purposes. As I know, in CXF handlers were >>> changed >>> to interceptors. But I can't find, how add headers in interceptor. Can I >>> set >>> some value to header in inteceptor? >>> >>> 2. Does CXF support this xfire construction: >>> <property key="com.somepackage.SomeClassImpl.implementation"> >>> com.somepackage.SomeClass </property>? >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/XFire-Migration-tp20619183p20619183.html >>> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/XFire-Migration-tp20619183p20621086.html > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
