thank you for kind responses. what about schema types. is there a trick to make auto generated wsdl contain my schema types ?
r a f t Andrew Clegg wrote: > > I don't know where that WSDL comes from either, but if it's urgent, > you could always slap a remote debugger on Tomcat (or whatever web app > container you're using) and see what happens when you request the > ?wsdl page. > > As in -- http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Developing#Q1 > > Although having said that, I'm not sure where you'd put the > breakpoint. Bit of a noob myself... > > Andrew. > > 2008/11/28 raft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> i'm a newbea in web services so excuse me if i asked something stupid :) >> but >> can someone please answer my question ? >> >> thanks.. >> r a f t >> >> >> raft wrote: >>> >>> thank you Daniel :) that reduced the number of wsdl files to one. >>> >>> but i have also noticed that my types aren't included in the schema part >>> of wsdl file. java2ws includes them correctly. do you knowhow to correct >>> it ? >>> >>> and for curiosity, what tool is running when i invoke serviceName?wsdl ? >>> isn't it a part of cxf ? if so i don't understand why java2ws and ?wsdl >>> generates different results >>> >>> thanks, >>> r a f t >>> >>> >>> dkulp wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wednesday 26 November 2008 11:12:24 am raft wrote: >>>>> hello, >>>>> >>>>> i'm using java first approach. the java2ws and serviceUrl?wsdl >>>>> generate >>>>> different forms of wsdl documents. to be precise the later generates >>>>> two >>>>> wsdl documents where one imports the other. is it possible to change >>>>> this >>>>> behaviour ? >>>> >>>> Technically, the one generated from java2ws is wrong, or at least not >>>> per >>>> jaxws/jws spec. Probably a bug in the tool. >>>> >>>>> is it possible to configure or specify the wsdl generator >>>>> running in response to serviceUrl?wsdl ? >>>> >>>> Make sure both the "Impl" class and the Interface have @WebService >>>> annotations >>>> and that both of them have the SAME targetNamespace defined. That >>>> should do >>>> it. Per spec, if they don't have the same target namespace, the >>>> "logical" >>>> part should be in one wsdl/namespace and the physical part in another. >>>> That's what you are seeing. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Kulp >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> http://dankulp.com/blog >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/configuring-the-WSDL-generator-at-serviceUrl-wsdl-tp20703988p20732209.html >> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/configuring-the-WSDL-generator-at-serviceUrl-wsdl-tp20703988p20732760.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
