Of course, that's just the prefixes.. Perhaps I should ask if anyone has any experience with products written around Axis1 WSDL that failed when using CXF?
One thing I do note is that if I set use=Use.ENCODED, the WDSL generated by CXF produces use="literal". Why is this? john On Sunday 14 December 2008 13:30:36 you wrote: > Hi, > > I've used CXF on a few projects and I'm seriously impressed with the > quality of the product. I'm currently porting some old Axis1 webservices > over to CXF and while my new WS works perfectly, I do have a little problem > with the WSDL generated. The problem is that I need a fairly old product > to parse the WSDL and it's currently failing. I don't think this is the > fault of CXF but perhaps CXF can be configured to produce a WSDL that this > old product seems to accept. > > I've annotated my interface with the following: > > @WebService > @SOAPBinding(style=Style.RPC, use=Use.LITERAL) > > and it's producing WSDL for a method as follows: > > <wsdl:operation name="authenticate"> > <soap:operation soapAction="" style="rpc"/> > <wsdl:input name="authenticate"> > <soap:body namespace="http://services.integration.javasystemsolutions.com/"; > use="literal"/> > </wsdl:input> > <wsdl:output name="authenticateResponse"> > <soap:body namespace="http://services.integration.javasystemsolutions.com/"; > use="literal"/> > </wsdl:output> > </wsdl:operation> > > However Axis1.4 generates the following WSDL: > > <wsdl:operation name="authenticate"> > <wsdlsoap:operation soapAction=""/> > <wsdl:input name="authenticateRequest"> > <wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"; > namespace="http://ws.webapp.javasystemsolutions.com"; use="encoded"/> > </wsdl:input> > <wsdl:output name="authenticateResponse"> > <wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"; > namespace="http://localhost:8080/myservice"; use="encoded"/> > </wsdl:output> > </wsdl:operation> > > Why do they look subtly different and is it possible for CXF to be > configured to produce something like Axis, purely for the benefit of a > product that is a bit difficult.. :) > > Thanks for the wonderful product. >
