This is a bug in the Jaxb RI 2.1.9. On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote:
> Well, my first question will be whether you have found a bug in the JAXB > reference implementation. I am trying to remember how to quickly investigate > that, I think I have an idea which I will try (running their java-to-schema > tool and see if it includes your wayward element). > > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:58 AM, kar...@sf <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> bimargulies wrote: >> > >> > JAXB is the default. I can't tell if someone us using the default unless >> I >> > ask them, now, can I? >> > >> >> My message was not intended to criticize your query. I just wanted to pick >> up this old conversation from where it was left, and thought the right way >> would be to answer to your question first. I am sorry, if my message >> offended you. >> >> Now that we are sure that JAXB is used, at least in my scenario, does >> anyone >> see a problem in the described setup, or something I might have missed and >> could share his/her experience or thoughts? Please also have a look at the >> test project I have attached to the issue in JIRA >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2041 >> >> Thank you, >> Kariem >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/CXF-doesn%27t-respect-annotations-tp19894613p22022881.html >> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >
