Hi Eoghan, Thank you very much for the responses! It sounds promising so far. So I guess the first step for us would be to have a closer look at CXF and current D-OSGi implementation.
Regards, Philipp > -----Original Message----- > From: Eoghan Glynn [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:47 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Java objects and JMS in Distributed OSGi > > > > Hi Philipp, > > > What about sending service arguments directly as Java objects > > using JMS without converting it to XML? Is that supported by CXF? > > Well, CXF has an "object binding" that was originally intended to allow > optimization of the collocated case (i.e. where both the proxy and the > target endpoint are hosted in the process space). The object binding > was designed to be used with a specialized "local transport" that just > passes the object payload directly in memory. However it may be > possible to adapt a remoteable transport like JMS for use with this > binding, i.e. by marshalling the object payload as a JMS ObjectMessage. > I guess this would depend though on the raw arguments being > serializable and encapsulated in a single aggregator object. > > > Since our app is OSGi based, I'd also be curious about plans > > regarding JMS-support by the CXF-based Distributed OSGi > > implementation? > > I'm planning to look into adding JMS support to distributed OSGi. The > main task here would involve figuring out how to enable the CXF JMS > transport in a purely programmatic fashion (i.e. in the absence of pre- > existing WSDL or spring config). I hope to have some time to look into > this in the next few weeks. > > Cheers, > Eoghan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philipp Konradi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thu 12/02/2009 16:20 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Java objects and JMS in Distributed OSGi > > Hi all, > > I'm new to CXF and have here some beginner questions: > > - Looking to CXF website, I saw some XML-based data-bindings. What > about sending service arguments directly as Java objects using JMS > without converting it to XML? Is that supported by CXF? Our app has > high-throughput requirements to fulfill and requires support for > publish-subscribe mechanisms. > > - Since our app is OSGi based, I'd also be curious about plans > regarding JMS-support by the CXF-based Distributed OSGi > implementation? Any schedules? How much effort is associated with > adding that support? > > Any hints are highly appreciated. > > Regards, > Philipp >
