Benson,
 
I have attached a wireshark dump to the JIRA at 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1956 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1956>  . It isolates the packet in 
question and should show conclusively that the problem is how CXF is generating 
the SOAP envelope. Please note that this was run on the Tomcat server and shows 
the response from the server address (10.0.8.13) to my client address (75....). 
If you open the ws_dump_20090221.pcap file and navigate to the Packet Details 
panel, and then expand the "extensible Markup Language" node, you will notice 
how it shows a "[ ERROR: Unrecognized text ] " after the id node. 
 
The funny thing is, as I originally reported, it generally returns this exact 
same data correctly on the first web service request, but somehow screws it up 
on the second, third, etc. I do notice that, in this case, the garbage is 
appended after the id node, which would be the GuestCommentId entity in 
relation to the GuestComment entity. Because it sometimes returns this exact 
same record just fine, and other times not, it rules out that the node element 
genuinely contains bad data within the database.
 
Please let me know if I can provide anything further to verify that this is a 
CXF problem or not.
 
Thanks,
 
Ron Grimes
 

________________________________

From: Benson Margulies [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sat 2/21/2009 12:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CXF 2.1 to CXF 2.2



Ron,

I missed your last addition to this bug offering concrete evidence.
Somehow we have to come up with a reproduction of this that we can
work with.

--benson



On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Ron Grimes <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you're going to develop with Flex and CXF, there are some very quirky 
> features you should be aware of:
>
> 1). Sometimes it helps to define your resultFormat to use "xml" instead of 
> "e4x". See 
> http://www.flexer.info/2008/09/10/httpservice-requesting-xml-from-feedburner-gets-parsed-with-xsl-in-ie-browser/
>
> 2) Marshalling XML to the Flex/Flash client can be problematic if the HTTP 
> response headers contain No-Cache. See 
> http://faindu.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/ie7-ssl-xml-flex-error-2032-stream-error/
>
> 3) Apache CXF sometimes returns garbage at the end of the SOAP envelope, 
> which causes a fault in Flex. See my JIRA entry at 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1956 . I was able prove, via the 
> Jira incident's WireShark attachments, that its the Spring/Apache CXF web 
> service returning the garbage, but it remains unaddressed. I hope they solve 
> it soon. To solve this, I had to put some "fix-it" logic in the Flex fault 
> method to strip out the garbage and re-process just the SOAP envelope.
>
> Hope something here is helpful.
>
> Ron Grimes
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: charlie [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sat 2/21/2009 3:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: CXF 2.1 to CXF 2.2
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have upgarded from 2.1.3 -> 2.2-SNAPSHOT as I need the multipart/form-data
> stuff. I have a flex client that runs in different browser calling these
> endpoints. Since the upgrade some of the endpoints have stopped working for
> the flex client. It was throwing a parseing exception. So i looked at the
> XML. From Internet Explorer and Safari I get this:
> {"Response":{"expiryDate":1235157506359,"passwordHash":"5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99","roleId":3,"securityToken":"<?xml
> version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" ?><TOKEN
> TYPE=\"2\"><PUBLIC><MEMBER-ID>0<\/MEMBER-ID>
> <NAME>test<\/NAME><HOST>3<\/HOST><EXPIRY-DATE>1235170466370<\/EXPIRY-DATE><\/PUBLIC><CIPHER-TEXT><![CDATA[MNYIeugbGuJ7V1zq9nMm82JTlmiSswJMSokjYI5z9634nPkyJpWgDpuqcg3QkOXZmfCc6BX7m7+togEG4bAFsSggKFgPmlm+nefFLhZ8EOofmSTq\/or0wrMar3WA1WlbZGkGZOjl6A+6v9oSONvsdJW4PLP7Lk06iwwIeZdbFXmeKSWxdonCXw==]]><\/CIPHER-TEXT><\/TOKEN>","status":"OK"}}
>
> But is correct in Firefox:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"
> standalone="yes"?><Response><expiryDate>1235157552986</expiryDate><passwordHash>5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99</passwordHash><roleId>3</roleId><securityToken>&lt;?xml
> version=&quot;1.0&quot; encoding=&quot;UTF-8&quot; ?&gt;&lt;TOKEN
> TYPE=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;PUBLIC&gt;&lt;MEMBER-ID&gt;0&lt;/MEMBER-ID&gt;
> &lt;NAME&gt;test&lt;/NAME&gt;&lt;HOST&gt;3&lt;/HOST&gt;&lt;EXPIRY-DATE&gt;1235170512998&lt;/EXPIRY-DATE&gt;&lt;/PUBLIC&gt;&lt;CIPHER-TEXT&gt;&lt;![CDATA[MNYIeugbGuJ7V1zq9nMm82JTlmiSswJMSokjYI5z962n6dp9vkO/Kf51/hIjtDzPmfCc6BX7m7+togEG4bAFsSggKFgPmlm+nefFLhZ8EOofmSTq/or0wrMar3WA1WlbZGkGZOjl6A+6v9oSONvsdJW4PLP7Lk06iwwIeZdbFXmeKSWxdonCXw==]]&gt;&lt;/CIPHER-TEXT&gt;&lt;/TOKEN&gt;</securityToken><status>OK</status></Response>
>
> It Almost seems like the browser have transform the data. Is there any thing
> I need to do to instruct the marshalling in 2.2?
>
> Thanks
> Charlie
>
> --
> http://finker.wordpress.com/
>
>
>


Reply via email to