I don't think it is actually the result of the type mapper, since all
methods, even those with simple arguments and default-mapped-types are
failing.
I think it is simple enough to see realize that if the generated wsdls are
different, i.e. missing/different schema definitions, then different
versions will not work.
It really appears that passivity is not being given a high enough priority
with 2.1 and 2.2 branches. Are there test run to determine whether 2.0
clients/services work with 2.1/2.2 clients/services? My tests are hit and
miss, but most do not work.
dkulp wrote:
>
> On Tue February 24 2009 1:30:13 pm relphie wrote:
>> I have tried the same thing with another of my simpler services -
>> connecting a 2.0.x client to a 2.2 server - and it seems to be working
>> fine. I think the problems appear with my more complicated service where
>> I
>> had define a custom type mapper for one of my interfaces. I use the
>> interface as a map key, and it appears that the schema for that return
>> value is not being properly generated. Here is my interface:
>
> How is the type mapper registered? It may be that that isn't being
> picked
> up.
>
> With 2.1/2.2, you can add @XmlJavaTypeAdapter annotations onto the actual
> methods as well to get things mapped for the Maps.
>
> Dan
>
>
>>
>> <code>
>> @WebService
>> public interface OrganizationService
>> {
>> public Collection<Organization> retrieveByAlias(OrganizationAlias
>> alias);
>>
>> public Map<OrganizationAlias, Collection<Organization>>
>> retrieveByAliases(Collection<OrganizationAlias> aliases);
>>
>> public Map<String, Organization> retrieveByIds(Collection<String>
>> organizationIds);
>> }
>> </code>
>>
>> And I will attach the generated 2.0 and 2.2 wsdls:
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22187629/OrganizationService.wsdl
>> OrganizationService.wsdl
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22187629/OrganizationService22.wsdl
>> OrganizationService22.wsdl
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> relphie wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I am attempting to upgrade my 2.0.9 cxf service to 2.2-SNAPSHOT.
>> > However, with my 2.0.9 client, I am unable to pass my tests connection
>> to
>> > a 2.2-SNAPSHOT server. Also, the server side WSDL that is generated is
>> > different between the 2.0.9 version and the 2.2 version. Is this to be
>> > expected? Is 2.0.9 and 2.2-SNAPSHOT compatible?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Brian
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CXF-2.0--%3E-2.2-tp22171176p22190080.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
