Andrew Clegg-2 wrote:
>
> I don't get it... How does building the XML payload differently mean
> you get a SOAPAction header? Or do you mean, when you do it this way,
> you don't need a SOAPAction header?
>
>
Sorry I couldn't help you. In my case just passing the unencoded XML made
it work -- just for the fun of it, give it a try! I remember that I saw,
using debugger, that action was being set (somewhere deep in the CXF stack),
but it didn't get written as part of the POST request. If you have a small
and simple example that illustrates the problem, may be someone from the CXF
team can take a look and help.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Sending-XML-payload-without-encoding-it-tp21925398p22439233.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
