Here is a tiny patch for http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/maven-plugins/codegen-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/maven_plugin
it only contains some javadoc for Option attributes based on wsdl2java command line option documentation Cheers, Nicolas On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'd be pleased to contribute the wiki documentation, but have no write > > permission on it (my apache wiki ID is "nicolas"). > > You do now. :-) > > I've added you to the asf-cla group on confluence so you should be able to > edit many of the wiki's there. (activemq, camel, smx, etc....) > > Dan > > > > On Wed March 11 2009 4:02:26 am nicolas de loof wrote: > > > Well, one issue is that we don't use maven to generate the site. > Thus, > > > putting javadoc on there would be irrelevant. :-) > > > > > > In all seriousness, patches would be most welcome, both for the code > but > > > also > > > for the docs on the site: > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/maven-integration-and-plugin.html > > > > Not using maven to generate the doc is not an issue, and as the plugin > > mostly uses nested types (Option) to configure the maven generated doc > > would not be very usefull. So any user that want to know plugin > parameters > > will have > > 1. To discover what's the underlying class (some link to javadoc in wiki > > would be great) > > 2. To analyze the Option attributes as the're is no javadoc > > > > Link to the wsdl-to-java page just help to discover parameters, but is > not > > very user-friendly > > > > I can help by posting a patch about javadoc, > > > > I'd be pleased to contribute the wiki documentation, but have no write > > permission on it (my apache wiki ID is "nicolas"). > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon March 9 2009 10:24:10 am nicolas de loof wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > any chance to get CXF-1997 fixed ? > > > > > > This may look only a "who cares" issue, but as I'm writing a book > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > maven > > > > > > > > > > > and would like to use CXF in my samples, I'd prefer to have "best > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > bread" > > > > > > > > > > > plugins as samples :-) > > > > > > > > > > I'll update this later today for 2.2. I'm not going to back port > > > > > this to 2.1.x as I'm not really sure what impact this would have on > > > > > existing people. > > > > > You never know what wacky things people are doing with the > generated > > > > > code. > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > I'll add it to the migration guide though. > > > > > > > > > > > As a side note, is there any plan to refactor the maven plugin to > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > > > > "mavenized" parameter, better that just getting the command line > > > > > > > > > > arguments > > > > > > > > > > > as <extraarg> ? > > > > > > > > > > I think this has been in since 2.1.3. The wsdlOption stuff has a > > > > > nearly complete set of properties: > > > > > > > > > > protected List<String> packagenames; > > > > > protected List<String> extraargs = new ArrayList<String>(); > > > > > protected File outputDir; > > > > > List<String> namespaceExcludes; > > > > > Boolean defaultExcludesNamespace; > > > > > Boolean defaultNamespacePackageMapping; > > > > > File dependencies[]; > > > > > File redundantDirs[]; > > > > > String bindingFiles[] = new String[0]; > > > > > String wsdlLocation = DEFAULT_WSDL_LOCATION; > > > > > String frontEnd; > > > > > String dataBinding; > > > > > String wsdlVersion; > > > > > String catalog; > > > > > boolean extendedSoapHeaders; > > > > > boolean validateWsdl; > > > > > String serviceName; > > > > > boolean autoNameResolution; > > > > > boolean noAddressBinding; > > > > > > > > > > extraargs is still there for compat as well as to specify any extra > > > > > > flags > > > > > > > > not > > > > > addressed above (like -verbose, but that is now auto hooked into > > > > > mvn's > > > > > > -X > > > > > > > > flag) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Daniel Kulp > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Kulp > > > [email protected] > > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
