Well, WS-Addressing version 2005/08 is already supported by CXF, and is default version used on the wire and the native version used internally in the stack. Its only in the special case of WS-A used in conjunction with WS-RM that we fallback to the older WS-A version 2004/08. This is because the WS-RM 1.0 spec requires usage of the WS-A version 2004/08 (in fact that requirement was the whole motivation for implementing multi-version WS-A support in CXF).
Now we could follow WCF's example and allow WS-RM 1.0 to be used with the 2005/08 version of WS-A. While I don't think this is correct from a spec point of view, we could just be pragmatic and allow it for reasons of interop. It would take a bit of change in the WS-RM layer to make this a reality though. Cheers, Eoghan 2009/3/30 Bryan Kearney <[email protected]> > Eoghan Glynn wrote: > >> Hi Bryan, >> >> Did you mean the 2006/08 version (as opposed to 2005)? Otherwise known as >> WS-RM 1.1. >> >> Sorry... wsAddressing. I dont know the relationship between addressing > ans WSRm.I was playing with WCF wsDualHttp binding.. and it is sending > > http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing > > headers. Is that something which is supported? > > -- bk > >
