Hi there,
I'm starting to use Continuations in my code... I'm presuming that they're
all nicely working. ;-)
I noticed the following code on Sergey's blog:
Continuation c = provider.getContinuation();
synchronized (c) {
...
}
Does the continuation really have to be synchronised or does the API
guarantee the object as being thread safe? Given the domain I would have
thought that the API and underlying implementations should be able to cope
with reentrancy.
Kind regards,
Christopher
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Continuations-and-thread-safety-tp22920013p22920013.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
