I agree fully!By way of example, the discussions in the GWT forums about the "best" extension libraries and frameworks have been high in temperature and low in usefulness! Regards Chris
2009/4/14 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> > Personally, I don't like such discussions as I find them being of little > use and distracting for people working on the implementation. > Users are not blind and can easily figure out what implementation they'd > like to work with - let them do a bit of home work. > > I'd like to remind once again : please keep discussing implementation > specific features of concrete JAXRS implementations on the corresponding > user lists - I don't think it's a good etiquette to do otherwise > > thanks, Sergey > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Strachan" < > [email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:04 PM > Subject: Re: What project is the more advanced ? > > > > This might help, it describes the extensions to JAX-RS supported in > Jersey... > http://blogs.sun.com/sandoz/entry/jersey_features_and_documentation > > 2009/4/14 Raphael F. <[email protected]>: > >> Hello everyone. >> >> I wonder what is the project the more advanced between Apache CXF & >> Sun Jersey concerning the implementation of JSR 311: JAX-RS ? >> >> Does one of them is more advanced than the other one ? If yes, which one ? >> >> Thanks by advance >> >> -- >> Raphaël F. >> >> L'avenir de nos Libertés Fondamentales passe par la défense de nos >> Libertés Numériques ! >> Promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre : http://www.april.org/ >> Les projets numériques liberticides du gouvernement français et de >> l'Europe : http://www.laquadrature.net/ >> OpenOffice.org en images : >> http://www.csdm.qc.ca/sitsat-mtl/openoffice/index.htm >> "Ce qu'il y a de scandaleux dans le scandale, c'est qu'on s'y >> habitue." Méditez-y... >> >> > > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/ >
