By the way, Ahmed, can you try instead putting Aegis XML mappings file (as opposed to using Spring for configuring Aegis) into the same package where your service class is located ? The default Aegis context should probably find it

cheers, Sergey
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sergey Beryozkin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [DOSGi]"Could not determine how to read type" exception under 
DOSGi, How to solve?


Hi Eoghan

great catch - should we also get the bus from it, as well as conduit/transports ? One might want to use Spring DM to preconfigure the default bus/etc ?

cheers, Sergey

----- Original Message ----- From: "Eoghan Glynn" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [DOSGi]"Could not determine how to read type" exception under 
DOSGi, How to solve?


Hi Ahmed,

The problem is that dOSGi just just news up a fresh Aegis or JAXB
databinding instance (the type depending on a property), instead of
using a spring-loaded databinding if available. See [1] for the
context. We could I guess just grab the injected databinding from the
Bus ApplicationContext instead.

Please raise a JIRA for this.

Cheers,
Eoghan

[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/trunk/dsw/cxf-dsw/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/dosgi/dsw/handlers/PojoConfigurationTypeHandler.java

2009/7/22  <[email protected]>:
I'm stuck with this problem. Please help.

To make it short:

Given the following method in a published service interface:

Object getResult();

and a service implementation and some class Foo:

public Object getResult(){
return new Foo();
}


When the remote consumer tries calling getResult via the service proxy it
gets this akin exception:
org.apache.cxf.interceptor.Fault: Could not determine how to read type:
{..some qname..} Foo


I tried to let aegis know about the extra type (Foo) customizing the
AegisConext object by putting the following code in
my_bundle/META-INF/spring/context.xml:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context";
xmlns:cxf="http://cxf.apache.org/core"; xmlns:jaxws="
http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context

http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-2.5.xsd
http://cxf.apache.org/core
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/core.xsd
http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/jaxws.xsd";
default-autowire="byName">
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf.xml" />
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-soap.xml"
/>
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-servlet.xml" />

<bean id="aegisDatabinding"
class="org.apache.cxf.aegis.databinding.AegisDatabinding">
<property name="aegisContext">
<bean class="org.apache.cxf.aegis.AegisContext">
<property name="writeXsiTypes"
value="true" />
<property name="rootClassNames">
<set>
<value>some.package.Foo</value>

</set>
</property>
</bean>
</property>
</bean>
</beans>

When debugging it seems this is picked up by spring, so an AegisContext
object is instantiated with the good values of writeXsiTypes and
rootClassNames props. Yet another instance of AegisDatabinding with the
"wrong" AegisContext is created, bound to my service then used when the
remote consumer is interacting with my osgi service through the proxy!

Is this the right way to solve such problems under DOSGi? if so what am I
doing wrong?

Please help, we're initially stuck at this very point while integrating
DOSGi with our osgi app.


- We are using DOSGi snapshot 1.1 with zooKeeper based discovery.
- The only point our osgi app comes in touch with Spring or cxf
webservices is through DOSGi.
- I didn't change any xml file in the META-INF/cxf/ of the Snapshot DSW.

Any help is kindly appreciated :)
Many thanks.








Reply via email to