Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I am sort of hoping someone can prove me wrong here? :) Also I am > wondering > > what proper alternatives would be. Java 6 compiler support maybe but I > > still like java 5 :) At least making the compiler strategy pluggable > would > > be good (JCI?)! > > I'm not sure either. I suppose one option would be allow use of the > eclipse > compiler. That's probably an OSGi bundle already. I've never looked > into > it though.
I know it works cause we used it in one of our products to have just that untill we removed the need for compiling on the fly altogether :) > A patch to make things more pluggable would be more than welcome. :-) *arf* me and my big mouth... Just had my first look at the CXF codebase so I don't know what I can come up with on short notice but I'll have a look ;) Regards, Bram > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Bram de Kruijff > Subject: Re: Using DynamicClientFactory in OSGi context > > On Thu July 23 2009 9:42:47 am Bram de Kruijff wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The question popped up in at the end of on earlier reply but somehow > it > > stuck. Looking at the DynamicClientFactory.setupClasspath(...) > > implementation that constructs the cp to pass to javac, I'd say this > can > > never be used in and OSGi context where packages are provided through > OSGi > > ContentClassLoaders. I only found this related issue which seems to > have > > resolved itself without actually changing anything > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1798. > > > > I am sort of hoping someone can prove me wrong here? :) Also I am > wondering > > what proper alternatives would be. Java 6 compiler support maybe but I > > still like java 5 :) At least making the compiler strategy pluggable > would > > be good (JCI?)! > > I'm not sure either. I suppose one option would be allow use of the > eclipse > compiler. That's probably an OSGi bundle already. I've never looked > into > it though. > > A patch to make things more pluggable would be more than welcome. :-) > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
