Hi

I thought you were asking about fileds like

@Context
private HttpHeaders headers;

such fields are indeed thred-safe even with singleton resource classes, it is 
thread-safe proxies which are injected in such cases.

Now, as far as supporting Spring prototypes is concerned I haven't got to 
fixing this JIRA yet :

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2197

You might want to try using CXFNonSpringJaxrsServlet and set a jaxrs.scope parameter to 'prototype' or register a JAXRS Application impl - that is the only way at the moment to work with prototypes (programmatic config is supported too)

cheers, Sergey

----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathaniel Auvil" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Thread Safety


I thought a singleton was not threadsafe by default, such as a Java
Servlet?  I did a more thorough reading of the CXF docs and saw the Spring
configured Resource classes are Singletons and not Prototype Beans.  So in
other words, each request will share the same instance of my AccountService
Resource class.  If i have a member variable: private Account account, this
will be shared by all requests and get overwritten by each request.  Right?




On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>wrote:

Hi

----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathaniel Auvil" <
[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:18 PM
Subject: Thread Safety



 I am implementing JAX-RS web service with CXF and i want to confirm my
Resource classes are thread safe.  i am thinking they are as the examples
show member variables holding various contexts and the like and no where
down the chain does the "AbstractService" extend java servlet.  Can
someone
in the know please confirm?


All the fields containing injected contexts are thread safe, when resource
classes are singletons, so yes resource classes are thread safe.

 and no where down the chain does the "AbstractService" extend java
servlet.


Can you clarify please what you meant to say ?

thanks, Sergey



Reply via email to