Hi Dan,
A one liner does it in ServiceWSDLBuilder in the buildPortType method:
addExtensibilityAttributes(portType, intf.getExtensionAttributes());
One other question re importing schema:
The ServiceWSDLBuilder class, when importing, creates a schema
location of:
String name = baseFileName + "_schema" + (++xsdCount) + ".xsd";
I'm just trying to work out how to reference these, but this line adds
a hard coded name.
I'm reading in the required xsds into XmlSchema objects and adding
these to the serviceInfo. Then the definition generates imports based
on the above.
Is there a more sensible way to import schema into the wsdl?
cheers,
Andrew
On 21 Sep 2009, at 15:15, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Andrew,
It's quite possibly a bug. While working on the WSPolicy
annotations last
month, I discovered a BUNCH of places in ServiceWSDLBuilder (the
class that
builds WSDL's from the service model) that were not calling the
addExtensibilityElements to add the extensors or calling
addDocumentation to
add the documentation elements. It's quite probable that they
aren't calling
the addExtensibilityAttributes method in all the needed places
either.
Check in there for the place where the portTypes are created and see
what it's
doing. Log a bug with a patch if I'm right. ;-)
Dan
On Mon September 21 2009 8:30:19 am Andrew Harrison wrote:
Hi,
A while back I threatened to implement WS-Eventing in CXF. I roughed
it in, but I have time to do it properly now.
So one thing I've noticed - I can't seem to set a WSDL portType
attribute from an InterfaceInfo object. I've tried:
info.addExtensionAttribute(new QName("http://www.w3.org/2009/06/ws-
evt", "EventSource"), "true");
but this doesn't get queried in
org.apache.cxf.wsdl11.ServiceWSDLBuilder so doesn't appear in the
WSDL.
Going from WSDL to an InterfaceInfo object works fine.
I'm working off the svn code.
cheers,
Andrew
On 24 Mar 2009, at 22:06, Andrew Harrison wrote:
I'm
implementing WS-Eventing.
oooooo....... Is the WS-Eventing stuff you are working on
possibly a
candidate to submit to CXF? :-)
Dan
Sure. I'm actually hacking this together in a matter of days at the
moment, so it's not very pretty at the moment. But I was hoping to
revisit it in a few weeks and see what could be salvaged.
cheers,
Andrew
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
