Thanks Eoghan,

Here's my cxf config:

<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
      xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
      xmlns:jaxws="http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws";
      xmlns:cxf="http://cxf.apache.org/core";
      xmlns:wsa="http://cxf.apache.org/ws/addressing";
      xmlns:http="http://cxf.apache.org/transports/http/configuration";
      xsi:schemaLocation="http://cxf.apache.org/core
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/core.xsd
       http://cxf.apache.org/transports/http/configuration
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/configuration/http-conf.xsd
       http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
       http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/jaxws.xsd";>

    <import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf.xml" />
    <import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-soap.xml"/>
    <import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-servlet.xml" />

    <bean id="logOutbound"
class="org.apache.cxf.interceptor.LoggingOutInterceptor"/>

    <bean id="mapAggregator"
class="org.apache.cxf.ws.addressing.MAPAggregator">
        <property name="allowDuplicates" value="false"/>
    </bean>
    <bean id="mapCodec" class="org.apache.cxf.ws.addressing.soap.MAPCodec"/>

    <jaxws:client id="com.jcorp.service.OrderServiceSoap">
      <jaxws:features>
        <wsa:addressing xmlns:wsa="http://cxf.apache.org/ws/addressing"/>
      </jaxws:features>
    </jaxws:client>

    <cxf:bus>
        <cxf:inInterceptors>
            <ref bean="mapAggregator"/>
            <ref bean="mapCodec"/>
        </cxf:inInterceptors>
        <cxf:inFaultInterceptors>
            <ref bean="mapAggregator"/>
            <ref bean="mapCodec"/>
        </cxf:inFaultInterceptors>
        <cxf:outInterceptors>
            <ref bean="mapAggregator"/>
            <ref bean="mapCodec"/>
        </cxf:outInterceptors>
        <cxf:outFaultInterceptors>
            <ref bean="mapAggregator"/>
            <ref bean="mapCodec"/>
        </cxf:outFaultInterceptors>

        <cxf:features>
            <wsa:addressing/>
             <cxf:logging/>
        </cxf:features>
    </cxf:bus>

</beans>

And I'm seeing this in the logs:

INFO: Pre-instantiating singletons in
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.defaultlistablebeanfact...@ec4a87:
defining beans
[cxf,org.apache.cxf.bus.spring.BusApplicationListener,org.apache.cxf.bus.spring.BusWiringBeanFactoryPostProcessor,org.apache.cxf.bus.spring.Jsr250BeanPostProcessor,org.apache.cxf.bus.spring.BusExtensionPostProcessor,org.apache.cxf.resource.ResourceManager,org.apache.cxf.configuration.Configurer,org.apache.cxf.binding.BindingFactoryManager,org.apache.cxf.transport.DestinationFactoryManager,org.apache.cxf.transport.ConduitInitiatorManager,org.apache.cxf.wsdl.WSDLManager,org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseManager,org.apache.cxf.workqueue.WorkQueueManager,org.apache.cxf.buslifecycle.BusLifeCycleManager,org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ServerRegistry,org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ServerLifeCycleManager,org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientLifeCycleManager,org.apache.cxf.transports.http.QueryHandlerRegistry,org.apache.cxf.endpoint.EndpointResolverRegistry,org.apache.cxf.headers.HeaderManager,org.apache.cxf.catalog.OASISCatalogManager,org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ServiceContractResolverRegistry,org.apache.cxf.binding.corba.CorbaBindingFactory,org.apache.cxf.binding.corba.wsdl.WSDLExtensionRegister#0,org.apache.cxf.jaxws.context.WebServiceContextResourceResolver,org.apache.cxf.jaxws.context.WebServiceContextImpl,org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.SoapBindingFactory,org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.SoapTransportFactory,org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.customEditorConfigurer,org.apache.cxf.binding.xml.XMLBindingFactory,org.apache.cxf.ws.addressing.policy.AddressingAssertionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.ws.addressing.policy.AddressingPolicyInterceptorProvider,org.apache.cxf.ws.addressing.policy.UsingAddressingAssertionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.javascript.JavascriptQueryHandlerRegistry,org.apache.cxf.transport.local.LocalTransportFactory,org.apache.cxf.transport.http.policy.HTTPClientAssertionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.transport.http.policy.HTTPServerAssertionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.transport.http.policy.NoOpPolicyInterceptorProvider,org.apache.cxf.transport.http.ClientOnlyHTTPTransportFactory,org.apache.cxf.management.InstrumentationManager,org.apache.cxf.transport.http_jetty.JettyHTTPTransportFactory,org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSTransportFactory,org.apache.cxf.binding.object.ObjectBindingFactory,org.apache.cxf.binding.http.HttpBindingFactory,org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.JAXRSBindingFactory,org.apache.cxf.ws.security.policy.WSSecurityPolicyLoader,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.AssertionBuilderRegistry,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyInterceptorProviderRegistry,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.attachment.external.DomainExpressionBuilderRegistry,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.attachment.external.EndpointReferenceDomainExpressionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyBuilder,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyEngine,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.attachment.wsdl11.Wsdl11AttachmentPolicyProvider,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.attachment.ServiceModelPolicyProvider,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.mtom.MTOMAssertionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.mtom.MTOMPolicyInterceptorProvider,org.apache.cxf.ws.rm.RMManager,org.apache.cxf.ws.rm.policy.RMPolicyInterceptorProvider,org.apache.cxf.ws.rm.RMAssertionBuilder,org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.ServletTransportFactory,logOutbound,mapAggregator,mapCodec,com.telmetrics.perspectica.service.OrderServiceSoap.proxyFactory,com.telmetrics.perspectica.service.OrderServiceSoap,cxf.config];
root of factory hierarchy

Following the instructions at:
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/wsaconfiguration.html, I'm fairly certain I've
accomplished the first task, maybe my issue is with the 2nd.

The use of WS-Addressing is indicated by one of the following:

   1. A <UsingAddressing xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/wsdl";>
   element is attached to the <wsdl:port>, <wsdl:service> or <wsdl:binding>
   element.
   2. The (chosen alternative for the) effective policy of the message
   contains a <Addressing xmlns="
   http://www.w3.org/2007/02/addressing/metadata";> assertion or a
   <UsingAddressing> assertion from either one of the following three
   namespaces: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/policy,
   http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/wsdl,
   http://www.w3.org/2006/05/addressing/wsdl.
   3. Property org.apache.cxf.ws.addressing.using in the message context is
   set to Boolean.TRUE.


>From a configuration perspective, do you say anything glaringly obvious that
might be causing my problem?



2009/11/9 Eoghan Glynn <[email protected]>

> Jason,
>
> You shouldn't have to create the message properties explicitly. This should
> be done by the CXF WS-Addressing MAPAggregator interceptor (that runs
> *before* your custom interceptor). The MAPAggregator should be installed as
> a side-effect of setting the WSAddressingFeature. Can you bump up logging
> to
> the max to ensure the MAPAggregator is actually being traversed?
>
> /Eoghan
>
> 2009/11/9 Jason Clark <[email protected]>
>
> > Thanks again Eoghan,
> >
> > How do I go about setting the values that are retrieved by ContextUtils
> in
> > my Interceptor?
> >
> > I've created my addressing properties with:
> >
> >            Map<String, Object> requestContext =
> > ((BindingProvider)port).getRequestContext();
> >            AddressingProperties maps = new AddressingPropertiesImpl();
> >            requestContext.put(CLIENT_ADDRESSING_PROPERTIES, maps);
> >
> >            AttributedURIType messageID =
> > WSA_OBJECT_FACTORY.createAttributedURIType();
> >            messageID.setValue("urn:uuid:" + System.currentTimeMillis());
> >            maps.setMessageID(messageID);
> >
> >            Map<String, Object> requestContext = new HashMap<String,
> > Object>();
> >            requestContext.put(CLIENT_ADDRESSING_PROPERTIES, maps);
> >
> >            factory.setProperties( requestContext );
> >
> >
> > But at the Interceptor portion, ContextUtils.isOutbound(message) always
> > returns false, and ContextUtils.retrieveMAPs(message, true, true) returns
> > null.  I feel like I'm missing something fundamental here from a
> > configuration standpoint.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jason.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2009/11/4 Eoghan Glynn <[email protected]>
> >
> > > > Unless I'm mistaken, I should
> > > > try to modify the message at the WRITE phase?
> > >
> > > No, that would be too late as the WS-A codec interceptor would have
> > already
> > > run in the PRE_PROTOCOL phase, i.e. the message addressing properties
> > would
> > > already have been marshalled up using the default WS-A version by the
> > time
> > > your WRITE interceptor runs.
> > >
> > > So probably best to run it in the same phase as the WS-A interceptor
> > > responsible for aggregating the properties, straight after that
> > interceptor
> > > has been traversed:
> > >
> > > public class MyInterceptor extends AbstractSoapInterceptor {
> > >     public MyInterceptor() {
> > >         super(Phase.PRE_LOGICAL);
> > >        addAfter(MAPAggregator.class.getName());
> > >     }
> > >
> > > You also need to be careful that you only modify on the outbound leg,
> so
> > > handleMessage should probably look something like:
> > >
> > >   public void handleMessage(SoapMessage arg0) throws Fault
> > >   {
> > >       Message message = arg0.getMessage();
> > >      if (ContextUtils.isOutbound(message)) {
> > >        AddressingPropertiesImpl outMaps =
> > > ContextUtils.retrieveMAPs(message, true, true);
> > >        if (outMaps != null) {
> > >
> > > outMaps.exposeAs(VersionTransformer.Names200408.WSA_NAMESPACE_NAME);
> > >         }
> > >      }
> > >   }
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Eoghan
> > >
> > > 2009/11/3 Jason Clark <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > Thanks Eoghan,
> > > >
> > > > Maybe I'll try to go the interceptor route.  Unless I'm mistaken, I
> > > should
> > > > try to modify the message at the WRITE phase?
> > > >
> > > > I've updated my code:
> > > >
> > > >            MyInterceptor myInterceptor = new MyInterceptor();
> > > >
> > > >            ClientProxyFactoryBean factory = new
> > ClientProxyFactoryBean();
> > > >            factory.setServiceClass(OrderServiceSoap.class);
> > > >            factory.setAddress("
> > > > https://uatwebservice.jcorp.com/OrderService.asmx";);
> > > >             factory.getFeatures().add( new WSAddressingFeature() );
> > > >             factory.getOutInterceptors().add( myInterceptor );
> > > >
> > > >            OrderServiceSoap os = (OrderServiceSoap) factory.create();
> > > >
> > > >            os.getStudy( 234 );
> > > >
> > > > where my interceptor class is:
> > > >
> > > > public class MyInterceptor extends AbstractSoapInterceptor {
> > > >      public MyInterceptor() {
> > > >        super(Phase.WRITE);
> > > >      }
> > > >
> > > >    @Override
> > > >    public void handleMessage(SoapMessage arg0) throws Fault
> > > >    {
> > > >        AddressingPropertiesImpl inMaps =
> > > > RMContextUtils.retrieveMAPs(arg0.getMessage(),false, false);
> > > >
> > > > inMaps.exposeAs(VersionTransformer.Names200408.WSA_NAMESPACE_NAME);
> > > >    }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > which is throwing the exception:
> > > >
> > > > WARNING: WS-Addressing - failed to retrieve Message Addressing
> > Properties
> > > > from context
> > > > Nov 3, 2009 2:17:26 PM org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain
> > > > doIntercept
> > > > WARNING: Interceptor has thrown exception, unwinding now
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I thought this:
> > > > factory.getFeatures().add( new WSAddressingFeature() );
> > > >
> > > > would create the addressing properties?  I think I missing something
> > > pretty
> > > > major here.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Jason.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2009/11/3 Eoghan Glynn <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > > Jason,
> > > > >
> > > > > Our support for WS-A 2004/08 was added specifically for the CXF
> WS-RM
> > > > > implementation, as WS-RM 1.0 depended on that older version of
> WS-A.
> > > > >
> > > > > As a result the mechanism for enabling this feature is a tad
> > > unfriendly,
> > > > > requiring an API call on the AddressingProperties to specify the
> WS-A
> > > > > version you require.
> > > > >
> > > > > See for example how the WS-RM code calls this exposeAs() API:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/rt/ws/rm/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/ws/rm/RMManager.java
> > > > >
> > > > > AddressingPropertiesImpl inMaps =
> > RMContextUtils.retrieveMAPs(message,
> > > > > false, false);
> > > > >
> > > > > inMaps.exposeAs(VersionTransformer.Names200408.WSA_NAMESPACE_NAME);
> > > > >
> > > > > You could write a simple interceptor to run after the WS-A
> > > MapAggregator
> > > > > which takes a similar approach to the above.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Eoghan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2009/11/3 Jason Clark <[email protected]>
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Has anyone here had an opportunity to use the 2004/08 version of
> > > > > > WS-Addressing  (http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing
> ).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The service I'm attempting to connect to will only accept that
> > > version.
> > > > >  I
> > > > > > see on http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/ws-addressing.html that
> > "CXF
> > > > > > provides support for the 2004-08 and 1.0 versions of
> > WS-Addressing.",
> > > > but
> > > > > > haven't been able to determine what it is I need to do to change
> > it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In Axis2 1.4, I'm able to explicitly specify the version by :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> options.setProperty(org.apache.axis2.addressing.AddressingConstants.WS_ADDRESSING_VERSION,
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.axis2.addressing.AddressingConstants.Submission.WSA_NAMESPACE);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With CXF, I've set up WS-Addressing with:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >            ClientProxyFactoryBean factory = new
> > > > ClientProxyFactoryBean();
> > > > > >            factory.setServiceClass(OrderServiceSoap.class);
> > > > > >            factory.setAddress("
> > > > > > https://webservice.jcorp.com/OrderService.asmx";);
> > > > > >            factory.getFeatures().add(new WSAddressingFeature() );
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  And when I examine the raw request, I see:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="
> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/
> > > ">
> > > > > >    <soap:Header>
> > > > > >        <Action xmlns="*http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing*";>
> > > > > >
> > > http://service.jcorp.com/OrderServiceSoapPortType/getStudy
> > > > > >        </Action>
> > > > > >        <MessageID xmlns="*http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing*
> ">
> > > > > >
> >  urn:uuid:a559ae80-d667-4795-8d74-3e3c2319d1b3</MessageID>
> > > > > >        <To xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing";>
> > > > > > https://service.jcorp.com/OrderService.asmx
> > > > > >        </To>
> > > > > >        <ReplyTo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing";>
> > > > > >            <Address>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous
> > > > > >            </Address>
> > > > > >        </ReplyTo>
> > > > > >    </soap:Header>
> > > > > >    <soap:Body>
> > > > > >        <ns1:getStudy xmlns:ns1="http://service.jcorp.com/";>
> > > > > >            <ns2:arg0 xmlns="http://jcorp.com/service";
> > > > > >                xmlns:ns2="http://service.jcorp.com/
> > ">234</ns2:arg0>
> > > > > >        </ns1:getStudy>
> > > > > >    </soap:Body>
> > > > > > </soap:Envelope>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So it's attempting to do the right thing.  Could someone please
> > point
> > > > me
> > > > > in
> > > > > > the right direction?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to