Anyone have an inkling as to whether CXF is interpreting the spec correctly on this? Essentially we have an explicit wsaw:Action specified on a response message, yet because there is a soapAction set in the binding the wsaw:Action is ignored and replaced with the value of the soapAction.
Thanks, Craig. On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:54 AM, rduhard <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm currently implementing WS-Addressing in my web service and am a little > confused about the way CXF is populating the wsa:Action property on the > response message. Our WSDL (provided, not created) defines an input and > output message like this with corresponding wsaw:Action attributes defined: > > <wsdl:portType name="myMessage"> > ... > <wsdl:input message="messageType" wsaw:Action="ns:messageType.version" /> > <wsdl:output message="messageType-Response" > wsaw:Action="ns:messageType-Response.version" /> > ... > </wsdl:portType> > > There is also a soapAction defined in the <wsdl:binding> section: > ... > <soap:operation soapAction="ns:messageType.version" /> > ... > > From what I understand, the SOAPAction value is used in the HTTP Request > Header as information to the receiving server endpoint. But on the outbound > message, when populating the wsa:Action field in the outgoing SOAP Headers, > CXF first checks for the soapAction element and if it doesn't find one, it > then looks for the wsaw:Action value defined on the output message. > > I"m not sure if I'm missing something, but this seems backwards. I'm > defining an explicit value for the Action on the response message but it > first looks to the soapAction which I don't think should really apply to the > outbound message. > > The only way I can get it to select my explicitly defined wsaw:Action value > on the output is to remove the soapAction attribute from the WSDL (or set it > to empty string). However, this isn't an option going forward as we are not > the authors of the WSDL. > > Is it possible that CXF has implemented this wrong and has the action > look-up backwards? > > Thanks in advance, any help/ideas/insight is appreciated. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/WSDL-wsaw%3AAction-vs-soapAction-in-MAPs-on-the-response-message-tp26545030p26545030.html > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin twitter: craiger
