I don't have Tomcat 5 readily available here; I'll see if I get something set 
up.

With the resource mapped to "/{path}":
-- The first test yields the same results
-- The second test loses the "/" at the end of the path
-- The third test yields the same results
-- The fourth test fails to find a resource for "/"
-- The last test fails to find a resource for "/app/v1"

Sergey Beryozkin wrote, On 1/8/10 11:30 AM:
I've set up the test and will be looking into it now.
Can you give me a favor and try with Tomcat 5 ? And also without a custom path 
regex ?
I will be testing it all myself, but some independent tests can help. cheers, Sergey
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Allison [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wed 1/6/2010 12:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Path Oddity with UriInfo
I have been using v2.2.5, and I just verified that the development trunk does the same thing.

Thanks for your help.


Sergey Beryozkin wrote, On 1/6/10 12:14 PM:
Not sure what is happening, I'll need to sign off shortly, but will look into 
it tomorrow

cheers, Sergey


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Allison [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wed 1/6/2010 11:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Path Oddity with UriInfo
I have a JAX-RS application that I am deploying in Tomcat 6 using the CXFNonSpringJaxrsServlet servlet class. The application deploys at context "/app", the servlet is mapped to "/v1/*" and has a single resource mapped to "/{path:.*}". The resource gets a UriInfo object injected.

Right now, the resource simply displays UriInfo.getBaseUri and the path parameter. I am using a browser to access the resource. When I deploy the application, I access the following URIs (in order):

URI          | getBaseUri          | path param
-------------+---------------------+-----------
/app/v1      | http://host/        | "v1"
/app/v1/     | http://host/        | "v1/"
/app/v1/test | http://host/app/v1/ | "test"
/app/v1/     | http://host/app/v1/ | ""
/app/v1      | http://host/app/v1/ | "app/v1"

Am I doing something wrong?




Reply via email to