> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 9:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: How to have a super class of the resource class use CXF
> annotations?
>
> Actually, I've just reread your email...
>
> Injecting HttpHeaders into your abstract class is what I'd still
> recommend, but just pulling up a variable annotated with
> @HeaderParam should still work though I may need to add a test to
> verify it works with the abstract classes.
You can still test this, but I've concluded I'm going to need the
HttpHeaders object anyway, and I've verified that this works in the base
class, along with using prototype scope for the controllers.
> > Hi
> >
> > this should work, there's a couple of options, assuming you have an
> abstract class which all other resource classes extend
> >
> > 1. just have a private field :
> >
> > @Context
> > private HttpHeaders headers;
> >
> > 2. Alternatively, have a setter :
> >
> > // note, no @Context
> > private HttpHeaders headers;
> >
> > public void setHttpHeaders(HttpHeaders headers) {this.headers =
> headers;}
> >
> > this 2nd option may work better if you have Spring proxifying your
> resource classes; for ex, you could have a dedicated interface
> > like Injectable (the name of the interface is up to a user to
choose)
> which this abstract class will implement and thus will help
> > Spring to inject if Spring proxies are pure JDK proxies as opposed
to
> CGLIB ones...
> >
> > cheers, Sergey
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "KARR, DAVID (ATTCINW)" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 4:41 PM
> > Subject: How to have a super class of the resource class use CXF
> annotations?
> >
> >
> > That subject isn't worded quite right, but hopefully I can clear
that
> > up.
> >
> > I started out with a small handful of resource classes, each of
which
> > points to a separate portion of my domain classes. I realized that
> > there are some HTTP headers that I'd like to get automatically,
> without
> > specifying them explicitly in each method. I realized I could just
> > define an instance variable in the resource class and then put the
> > "@HeaderParam annotation on the field. That works fine. However,
> what
> > I'd really like to do is have a base class that all the resource
> classes
> > extend, which has the annotated instance variable. All I did was
> "pull
> > up" the instance variable and the getter/setter to a base class and
> > retested that, and I found that the instance variable was not set.
> >
> > Is there something I have to do to get CXF to look at the base class
> for
> > CXF annotations, or is this a scenario that isn't possible yet?
