Not 100% sure, hopefully soon-ish. It depends on user demand obviously.

BTW gmail seemed to mangle that anonymous URI in my last mail, appending an
"?id=2e7..." parameter for some reason.

Cheers,
Eoghan

On 15 February 2010 18:07, cmoulliard <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Thxs,
>
> When is it planned to move to ws-rm 1.1 ?
>
>
>
> Eoghan Glynn-4 wrote:
> >
> > Charles,
> >
> > The CXF WS-RM layer expects the wsrm:AcksTo address to be non-anonymous,
> > i.e. not equal to
> > "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous<
> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous?id=2e7dfecf-f888-45c6-8c21-5a10038ea9bc
> >
> > ".
> >
> > This is in order to allow timely ACKs to be sent in the absence of a
> > steady
> > stream of non-oneway requests (on the responses to which, the pending
> ACKs
> > could be piggy-backed). Because such a regular stream of incoming
> requests
> > is not in general guaranteed, CXF requires that the AcksTo address is not
> > anonymous.
> >
> > We will be able to relax this requirement when we move up to WS-RM 1.1
> > support (as this includes a mechanism for the client-side to probe for
> > pending ACKs).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Eoghan
> >
> > On 15 February 2010 17:16, cmoulliard <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I run an example of CXF using WS-RM spec 1.0 and I try to see the ACK.
> >> Unfortunately, this is not the case.
> >>
> >> Is it possible to receive an ACK ?
> >> Could this problem be related to ANONYMOUS TARGET (see text of the log
> >> here
> >> after) ?
> >>
> >> 17:56:49,937 | INFO  | 8...@qtp-32549725-0 | RetransmissionQueueImpl
> >>  |
> >> missionQueueImpl$ResendCandidate  402 | Cannot resend to anonymous
> >> target.
> >> Not sch
> >> eduling a resend.
> >> 17:56:49,953 | INFO  | 8...@qtp-32549725-0 | LoggingOutInterceptor
> >>  |
> >> ngOutInterceptor$LoggingCallback  170 | Outbound Message
> >> ....
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> 17:56:51,734 | WARN  | r-Timer-15060249 | Proxy
> >>  |
> >> org.apache.cxf.ws.rm.Proxy         72 |
> >> STANDALONE_ANON_ACKS_NOT_SUPPORTED
> >>
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Charles
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Charles Moulliard
> >> SOA Architect
> >>
> >> My Blog :  http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
> >> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://old.nabble.com/How-can-we-receive-ACK-using-CXF-and-WS-RM---tp27596956p27596956.html
> >> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> -----
> Charles Moulliard
> SOA Architect
>
> My Blog :  http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/ http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com/
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/How-can-we-receive-ACK-using-CXF-and-WS-RM---tp27596956p27597653.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to