Hi,
I done some more detailed excercises in meantime. Well the difference is:
in order to start the light version of server using JaxWsServerFactoryBean.
then we use only MTOM.
But in order to start server using Spring framework, then is more complex
variant
MTOM + XOP as default.
In this case I have two questions:
- How can I set in Spring only MTOM ?
- Haw can I tell (mens can set) the cxf client that the SOAP response is
more complicated, where is
both XOP + MTOM ? Because client is set as default for parsing simply
MTOM (without XOP)
Sincerely
KM
dkulp wrote:
>
>
> This sounds like a Mail provider issue of some sort. We generally ship
> (and
> use) the geronimo-mail jar (geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.6.jar) and the
> InternetHeaders object in there wouldn't be using the com/sun stuff. It
> looks like you are picking up a different mail jar and thus
> config/classloaders or similar may be different. My suggestion would be
> to
> check your classpath and such for various mail jars.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Mon February 22 2010 10:32:22 am Krzysztof Malinowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I my previous post I notified problem shortly. Let me add some details.
>> I observed some different results, when I turn on my service, which
>> exposes
>> some data based on MTOM.
>>
>> One, correct if I turned on service via JaxWsServerFactoryBean (we can
>> simply say in native CXF way).
>> And, wrong if I do the same in Spring environment.
>>
>> In the second case I can't get any data, even some simple, outside MTOM
>> mechanism. I notice the begin of exception stack like this:
>>
>> (...)
>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> com/sun/mail/util/LineInputStream
>> at javax.mail.internet.InternetHeaders.load(InternetHeaders.java:321)
>> at javax.mail.internet.InternetHeaders.<init>(InternetHeaders.java:301)
>> (...)
>>
>> During the test I have set it up the logging interceptors, so inside the
>> inInterceptor I notice interested part of respose message, but with some
>> additional binary part.
>>
>> In the first way, when I started service without Spring the entry of log
>> was clear.
>>
>> Obviouslly, in both tests I based on the same SEI and its implementation
>> class.
>>
>> Regards
>> Krzysztof
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/MTOM-difference-of-results-tp27689060p27704888.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
