I'm using 2.2.6.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> By default, JAX-WS (and thus CXF) creates the schemas with
> elementFormDefault=unqualified.   Thus, the "arg0" element should not be
> namespace qualified.   If  you want it qualified, then you would need to
> add a
> namespace parameter to the @WebParam annotation for it (assuming code first
> scenario), but keep in mind that if you do that, then the unqualified names
> would not work.
>
> You need to decide which form you want and set it up appropriately.   The
> other form would not work.
>
> One more note: what version of CXF are you using?  With 2.2.6, I'm
> surprised
> this gets a null passed in.   It should error out with an unknown element.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wednesday 17 March 2010 9:37:33 am Chris Hardin wrote:
> > I have a CXF service and a user is sending a Soap message to it like
> this\
> >
> > <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> > <soapenv:Body>
> >   <getApplication  xmlns="http://services.domain.com/";>
> >    <arg0 xmlns="http://services.domain.com/";>33</arg0>
> >   </getApplication>
> >  </soapenv:Body>
> > </soapenv:Envelope>
> >
> >
> > The parameter gets lost in parsing and a null gets passed to the service,
> > but if I remove the xmlns elements from the tags or put it in the header
> > and reference them in the tags, it works fine
> >
> > This works
> >
> > <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> > <soapenv:Body>
> >   <getApplication>
> >    <arg0>33</arg0>
> >   </getApplication>
> >  </soapenv:Body>
> > </soapenv:Envelope>
> >
> >
> > Can anyone give me a clue as to what is happening. I am lost.
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected]
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>

Reply via email to