Hopefully someone else can answer your question, but that would seem to be a buggy way to code that could cause security vulnerabilities. An element is defined by both its name and its namespace, coding just on the former doesn't seem very robust.
Glen Steve2001 wrote: > > Hi all, > I would like to generate client stubs without namespace. Is -nexclude > the right option? > I am trying to test if a cleint stub without any namespace can access a > service with name space that can change in the future. > > Thanks > Steve > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Generating-client-stubs-without-name-space-using-wsdl2java..-tp28245682p28247351.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
