This is helpful, thanks. But it is about persisting the JAXB beans on the server side ? My understanding is that JPA annotations should not affect the serialization of JAXB beans to the wire ?
cheers, Sergey On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Jason Chaffee <[email protected]> wrote: > If you take the position of some at java.net, then it would be that they > do belong together. See hyperjaxb3. > > https://hyperjaxb3.dev.java.net/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Clarification on using JAX-RS with CXF > > I really not sure what to recommend. > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Dan King <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm unclear about the following and I'd appreciate help in gaining > > clarification. > > > > 1. Can/should entities that are marked with JPA > > annotations also be marked with JAXB annotations for use as > > request/response objects? For example is the following acceptable? > > > > @XmlRootElement(name="Category") > > @Entity > > @Table(name="category") > > public class Category { ... } > > > > as far as marshaling Category as a JAXB bean, it does not matter what > other annotations Category might have > > > > > > 2. > > When using HTTP centric clients, must the client have a copy of the > > request/response objects. If yes, is there anyway around it? > > > > Can you clarify please. What problem you seeing, when using WebClients > > cheers, Sergey > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > > > > >
