When you use jms-config-ref then it overrides the settings in conduit.
So it is important to inject a completely configured connectionfactory
into it. Like I wrote the best way is to not use conduit at all in this
case.
Is there any reason why the solution of only having a client and a
jmsconfig does not work for you?
Greetingss
Christian
Am 07.05.2010 16:40, schrieb Nguyen Tien Luong:
In addition to my question, I wanna to understand how CXF gets/stocks their
informations in the declaration<jms:conduit ...> </jms:conduit>? Which classes
hold these information ( like jndiConnectionFactoryName,
jndiDestinationName,jndiReplyDestinationName ... )
The reason I ask this question is, normaly I have connectionFactory declared
in<jms:address jndiConnectionFactoryName="cf" .../>
And when I add<jms:jmsConfig-ref>jmsConf1</jms:jmsConfig-ref> in my bean's config, this reference jmsConf1 suddenly requires the property 'connectionFactory' !!!!!! This exception raised when I tried to take away 'connectionFactory' from the definition of jmsConf1
Caused by:
at
org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.RequiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.postProcessPropertyValues(
at
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.populateBean(
at
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(
... 16 more
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanInitializationException: Property 'connectionFactory' is required for bean 'jmsConf1'RequiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:121)AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:998)AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:472)
So if someone can explain to me how CXF can use all of JMS's information
(declared in the bean's configuration) and use them for its transport layer (
in this case, it's JMS )
Thanks
=========================================================================
NGUYEN Tien Luong | M2PGI - UFRIMAG
13 Rue Blanche MONIER | Tel : 06.45.42.46.33
38000 GRENOBLE | http://tienluong.info
----- Original Message ----
From: Nguyen Tien Luong<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 7 May, 2010 10:38:18
Subject: Re: Using the JMS via Configuration
Hi Christian ,
As I see the constructeur of
org.objectweb.joram.client.jms.tcp.QueueTcpConnectionFactory, there are no
parameters and it attemps only to create an empty QueueTcpConnectionFactory
instance.
(http://joram.ow2.org/current/javadoc/org/objectweb/joram/client/jms/tcp/QueueTcpConnectionFactory.html)
And in its methods, where we can put parameters to create a
QueueTcpConnectionFactory .
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
=========================================================================
NGUYEN Tien Luong | M2PGI - UFRIMAG
13 Rue Blanche MONIER | Tel : 06.45.42.46.33
38000 GRENOBLE | http://tienluong.info
----- Original Message ----
From: Christian Schneider<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 7 May, 2010 8:01:25
Subject: Re: Using the JMS via Configuration
Your connectionfactory bean does not contain any configuration. When
using the JmsConfiguration aproach then the contents of jmsconduit are
not used (at least I think so).
So you have to use the normal spring style to configure the
connectionfactory. The good thing is that you can either keep using jndi
or create a connectionfactory in the bean.
The easisest way will probably be to simply use the following:
<bean id="connectionFactory"
class="org.objectweb.joram.client.jms.tcp.QueueTcpConnectionFactory">
<constructor-arg value="your joram host url"/>
</bean>
This could already solve the propblem.
Greetings
Christian
--
----
http://www.liquid-reality.de