On Thursday 01 July 2010 3:41:59 am Jim Talbut wrote:
> Jira filed and patch submitted:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2865
> 
> The patch just permits both classes of exception, if there is a reason
> to increase the timeout too just let me know and I'll do another
> little patch.

Finally got around to applying this.   Been a busy couple weeks.   :-(

Thanks!
Dan


> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jim
> 
> Quoting Jim Talbut <[email protected]>:
> > On 30/06/2010 20:01, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> OK.  So I guess the fix is to update the test to increase the timeout to
> >> 2 secs or so and also catch and allow the SocketTimeoutException.  Want
> >> to contribute a patch?  (since you can test it on Windows and I cannot)
> >>  :-
> > 
> > Why do both?
> > Just checking for both exception types should work on all platforms:
> > Index:
> > src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/systest/dispatch/DispatchClientServerTest.ja
> > va ===================================================================
> > ---
> > src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/systest/dispatch/DispatchClientServerTest.ja
> > va (revision 959071)
> > +++
> > src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/systest/dispatch/DispatchClientServerTest.ja
> > va (working copy)
> > @@ -162,8 +162,9 @@
> > 
> >              fail("should not be a SOAPFaultException");
> >          
> >          } catch (WebServiceException ex) {
> >          
> >              //expected
> > 
> > -            assertTrue(ex.getCause().getClass().getName(),
> > -                       ex.getCause() instanceof
> > java.net.ConnectException); +           
> > assertTrue(ex.getCause().getClass().getName(),
> > +                       ex.getCause() instanceof
> > java.net.ConnectException +                       || ex.getCause()
> > instanceof
> > java.net.SocketTimeoutException);
> > 
> >          }
> >      
> >      }
> > 
> > Got to go for a bike ride now, I'll file a Jira and put the patch on
> > that tomorrow morning.
> > 
> > Jim
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://dankulp.com/blog

Reply via email to