Sergey,

Here is the response I got on [email protected] from Marc Hadley:

I assume you are trying to describe a representation that contains a Boolean
– right ?

I think a better way to represent this would as follows:

<representation mediaType=”text/plain”>
  <param name=”result” type=”xsd:Boolean” style=”plain”/>
</representation>

It might be worth considering switching from text/plain to something with a
bit more structure. E.g. you could use application/x-www-form-urlencoded:
instead of a body of “true” you’d send back “result=true”. That little bit
of extra structure will allow you to add additional information in the
future with less chance of breaking (well written) clients. In that case
you’d use style=”query” in the param element. Personally I’d use JSON or XML
but I understand the urge to keep things simple.

Marc.

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi
>
> sorry for a delay
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:38 PM, gilgal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > When cxf generates my WADL I get references to objects in the grammar
> > section, but if it is a primitive type it has a comment of what the
> > primitive type is but no element attribute set.  Is there a way to get
> what
> > is in the comment into the element attribute of the representation tag?
> >
> Here are two examples.
> > References the object in the grammar:
> > <resource path="/optout/individual/{individualId}">
> >
> > <method name="GET">
> > <request/>
> > <response>
> > <representation mediaType="application/xml" element="prefix1:indOptOut"/>
> > <representation mediaType="application/json"/>
> > </response>
> > </method>
> > </resource>
> > Has only a comment that it is xs:boolean:
> > <resource path="/ministering/remove/{unitNbr}/{individualId}">
> >
> >
> > <method name="DELETE">
> > <request/>
> > <response>
> > <!-- Primitive type : xs:boolean -->
> > <representation mediaType="application/xml"/>
> > <!-- Primitive type : xs:boolean -->
> > <representation mediaType="application/json"/>
> > </response>
> > </method>
> > </resource>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gil
> >
> >
> This might be done in principle. I'm not sure though what it will mean. XML
> schema does have datatypes such as xs:boolean, etc. But those datatypes are
> meant to be used by schemas defining new custom (complex or simple) types
> and elements, the XML ones. So if we have say a text/plain representation,
> then saying that a it's of type xsd:
>  integer for example, using @element attribute, seems a bit strange. But
> may
> be it could be just to do with reusing existing well-known datatypes, so
>
> <representation mediaType="text/plain" element="xsd:boolean"/>
>
> is kind of ok...
> I'll think about it.
> In meantime, if you could ask for some clarifications on the WADL list then
> it would really help. Ask if using @element="xsd:boolean" for non xml
> representations is acceptable
>
> thanks, Sergey
>
>
>
> --
>  > View this message in context:
> >
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/WADL-generation-question-tp2740129p2740129.html
> > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>

Reply via email to