Hi Just out of curiousity, why do you need the local transport in the DOSGI case ? If you have some service references injected then they'd be OSGI services as well...Sorry, I'm probably missing something, just would like to understand
thanks, Sergey On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Sven Zethelius <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks David. I didn't realize the way these were packaged. I managed to > find the full cxf-bundle-2.2.10 from the maven repository that should meet > my needs. > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Bosschaert [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DOSGI: dependency local transport and object binding not > included in cxf-bundle-minimal ? > > Hi Sven, > > CXF-DOSGi is simply using the cxf-bundle-minimal jar provided by the > main CXF project. If you think that the cxf-bundle-minimal should > contain more classes maybe you should file a bug on CXF for this? > > Best regards, > > David > > On 16 September 2010 14:02, Sven Zethelius <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm currently working on an OSGI project that uses CXF as a bundle, so we > picked up the DOSGI cxf-bundle-minimal-2.2.9.jar. I've noticed some of the > classes and other files that are included in cxf-2.2.9.jar aren't included > in the cxf-bundle-minimal-2.2.9.jar. Of interest to me is the fact that the > LocalTransportFactory and ObjectBindingFactory and their related classes are > being excluded. Is there a reason they are excluded from the bundle? Would > it be possible to add them? > > > > > > > > >
