If I know the thread and call interrupt() then the thread should
receive an InterruptedException. I think we should be able to handle
this exception and cancel the call.
I have looked into the jms transport to see how it handles the wait for
the response. In this case MessageConsumer.receive is called. I will
check how it reacts on an interrupt call.
Perhaps it already works like expected.
Regards
Christian
Am 01.10.2010 17:23, schrieb Sergey Beryozkin:
Yes, I agree, that would a really nice feature. But I'm not sure how an
association
between a given calling and blocked thread and the socket dealing with that
call can be achieved.
May be I'm over-complicating things, but if we start then we'll see :-)
cheers, Sergey
--
----
http://www.liquid-reality.de
