http://nemo.sonarsource.org/project/index/117804
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Robert Liguori <[email protected]> wrote: > If Sonar (whatever that is) already runs it, then it may be nice to add this > to the coding-guidelines page; http://cxf.apache.org/coding-guidelines.html. > > ... lets the user community know the software quality level you are at. :) > > -- Robert > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Benson Margulies" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:34 PM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Apache CXF and FindBugs > >> Let's slow down a bit on this idea and discuss it on the dev list. >> FindBugs has a very, very, very broad definition of a bug. I bet there >> are cases where checkstyle and findbugs *disagree* about some source >> construct. >> >> Things it complains of should be talked over on dev before anyone >> bothers to make patches. >> >> Our Sonar instances already runs it, I believe, so you can see what it >> complains about already. >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday 14 October 2010 10:53:17 am Robert Liguori wrote: >>>> >>>> I see that CXF makes use of PMD and Checkstyle ( >>>> http://cxf.apache.org/coding-guidelines.html). >>>> >>>> Any reason why CXF doesn't make use of FindBugs? - >>>> http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/ >>> >>> Most likely, no one really pursued it. Again, fixing issues that it >>> finds is >>> another valuable contribution. >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Kulp >>> [email protected] >>> http://dankulp.com/blog >>> >> >
